292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1463879)
1. The institutional review board: an evolving ethics committee.
Lind SE
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 1463879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Experience of a human investigation committee in a Canadian medical school.
Heughan C; Barrowman JA; Murphy TM; Stuart SR
Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Apr; 130(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 6704862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
Meslin EM
Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health science research ethics: a critique.
Coburn D
Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
Edgar H; Rothman DJ
Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Making the scientific ethical.
Wilson HS
J Nurs Adm; 1984 Nov; 14(11):6-7. PubMed ID: 6567661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In loco parentis. Minimal risk as an ethical threshold for research upon children.
Freedman B; Fuks A; Weijer C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(2):13-9. PubMed ID: 8463083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prior ethical review of animal versus human subjects research.
Prentice E; Jameton A; Antonson D; Zucker I
Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23(9):695-7. PubMed ID: 3182217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Remodelling IRBs.
Silberner J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(4):5. PubMed ID: 9762532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
Prentice ED; Antonson DL
IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The report of the Advisory Research Committee on the ethics review of research involving human subjects.
Queens Gazette; 1974 : 1-5, 30 Jan; 6(4) Suppl):. PubMed ID: 11663457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics review in Canada: highlights from a national workshop, part 2.
Miller JN
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1990 Jan; 23(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11650304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The chaplain's role on a hospital's committee on human experimentation.
Kerney LG
Bull Am Protestant Hosp Assoc; 1974; 38(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 11661209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical aspect of research involving elderly subjects.
Fletcher JC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):285-6. PubMed ID: 11642836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The strengths and weaknesses of university review committees to protect human rights.
Dymond S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1974 Aug; 55(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 4844661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An ethics issue for cadaver renal transplantation.
Dossetor JB
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(4):309-11. PubMed ID: 1463891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do medical student research subjects need special protection?
Christakis N
IRB; 1985; 7(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
Reiser SJ; Knudson P
IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
