314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14640061)
1. [Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].
Grootens KP; Assendelft WJ; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(45):2226-30. PubMed ID: 14640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Systematic reviews on infectious diseases. The Cochrane Collaboration].
Bonfill X; Martí J
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999; 17 Suppl 2():15-21. PubMed ID: 10605185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology.
Collier A; Heilig L; Schilling L; Williams H; Dellavalle RP
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 155(6):1230-5. PubMed ID: 17107394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.
Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K
Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Dutch authors in international medical journals are also authors of publications in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine)].
Veenemans J; Hoogeveen J; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Nov; 149(46):2573-6. PubMed ID: 16320669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Neonatal neurology decision-making starting from systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration].
González de Dios J
Rev Neurol; 2005 Apr 16-30; 40(8):453-9. PubMed ID: 15861325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project.
McKinlay RJ; Cotoi C; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 18394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.
Tricco AC; Tetzlaff J; Pham B; Brehaut J; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):380-386.e1. PubMed ID: 19128940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Significance of letters published in the Dutch Journal of Medicine, 1997/98].
Mahesh S; Kabos M; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar; 145(11):531-5. PubMed ID: 11284288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology.
Chen H; Jhanji V
Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):896-9. PubMed ID: 22446144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
Tricco AC; Pham B; Brehaut J; Tetroe J; Cappelli M; Hopewell S; Lavis JN; Berlin JA; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):617-623.e5. PubMed ID: 19162440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].
Donato HM; De Oliveira CF
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 17234084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
