These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14640838)

  • 1. Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect.
    Saint-Aubin J; Klein RM; Roy-Charland A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1191-210. PubMed ID: 14640838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of eye movements in the missing-letter effect revisited with the rapid serial visual presentation procedure.
    Saint-Aubin J; Kenny S; Roy-Charland A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 20384418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: further evidence from French.
    Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):665-76. PubMed ID: 9337585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interaction of word frequency and word class: a test of the GO model's account of the missing-letter effect.
    Roy-Charland A; Saint-Aubin J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jan; 59(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 16556556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solving the chicken-and-egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading.
    Roy-Charland A; Saint-Aubin J; Lawrence MA; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19801615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of words and letters within words.
    Johnson NF; Marmurek HH
    Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 742661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Familiarization effects for bilingual letter detection involving translation or exact text repetition.
    Thomas HK; Healy AF; Greenberg SN
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18266506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Cornett L; Goodin Z; Allen PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):751-73. PubMed ID: 18505335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: evidence with transposed-letter neighbors.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):290-300. PubMed ID: 18374323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priming of semantic classifications by novel subliminal prime words.
    Klauer KC; Eder AB; Greenwald AG; Abrams RL
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Mar; 16(1):63-83. PubMed ID: 16464617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One missing-letter effect: two methods of assessment.
    Saint-Aubin J; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Mar; 58(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15072209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visuoperceptual deficits in letter-by-letter reading?
    Mycroft RH; Behrmann M; Kay J
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1733-44. PubMed ID: 19397869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition.
    Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 17217942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.