These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14642030)
1. Urinary stone size: comparison of abdominal plain radiography and noncontrast CT measurements. Parsons JK; Lancini V; Shetye K; Regan F; Potter SR; Jarrett TW J Endourol; 2003 Nov; 17(9):725-8. PubMed ID: 14642030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size. Narepalem N; Sundaram CP; Boridy IC; Yan Y; Heiken JP; Clayman RV J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1235-8. PubMed ID: 11832704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of kidney-ureter-bladder abdominal radiography and computed tomography scout films for identifying renal calculi. Johnston R; Lin A; Du J; Mark S BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):670-3. PubMed ID: 19694714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of CT scan versus plain radiography for measuring urinary stone dimensions. Tisdale BE; Siemens DR; Lysack J; Nolan RL; Wilson JW Can J Urol; 2007 Apr; 14(2):3489-92. PubMed ID: 17466153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. Jackman SV; Potter SR; Regan F; Jarrett TW J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):308-10. PubMed ID: 10893571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of spiral computed tomography without contrast media and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of renal colic]. Thibeau JF; Sourtzis S; Bellemans MA; Vandendris M Prog Urol; 1999 Apr; 9(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 10370946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Renal tract calculi: comparison of stone size on plain radiography and noncontrast spiral CT scan. Dundee P; Bouchier-Hayes D; Haxhimolla H; Dowling R; Costello A J Endourol; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1005-9. PubMed ID: 17206892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of urinalysis, plain films, and spiral CT in ED patients with suspected renal colic. Eray O; Cubuk MS; Oktay C; Yilmaz S; Cete Y; Ersoy FF Am J Emerg Med; 2003 Mar; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 12671819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of ureteral stone measurements by CT and plain film radiography: utility of the KUB. Katz D; McGahan JP; Gerscovich EO; Troxel SA; Low RK J Endourol; 2003 Dec; 17(10):847-50. PubMed ID: 14744346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can computed tomography scout radiography replace plain film in the evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic? Ege G; Akman H; Kuzucu K; Yildiz S Acta Radiol; 2004 Jul; 45(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 15323403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Spiral computerized tomography without perfusion of contrast media as first line investigation in patients with renal colic]. Romano S; Rollandi GA; Scaglione M; Biscaldi E; Cantoni S; Rebaudi F; Del Vecchio A; Grassi R Radiol Med; 2000 Oct; 100(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 11155452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adequacy of low dose computed tomography in patients presenting with acute urinary colic. Fracchia JA; Panagopoulos G; Katz RJ; Armenakas N; Sosa RE; DeCorato DR J Endourol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1242-6. PubMed ID: 22545804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical characteristics of ureteral calculi detected by nonenhanced computerized tomography after unclear results of plain radiography and ultrasonography. Kobayashi T; Nishizawa K; Watanabe J; Ogura K J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 12913701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unenhanced spiral CT for the assessment of renal colic. How does limiting the referral base affect the discovery of additional findings not related to urinary tract calculi? Eshed I; Kornecki A; Rabin A; Elias S; Katz R Eur J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 41(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11750154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of digital abdominal radiography for the detection of ureter stones by stone size and location. Jung SI; Kim YJ; Park HS; Jeon HJ; Park HK; Paick SH; Kim HG; Lho YS J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):879-82. PubMed ID: 21084904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations of noncontrast CT for measuring ureteral stones. Van Appledorn S; Ball AJ; Patel VR; Kim S; Leveillee RJ J Endourol; 2003 Dec; 17(10):851-4; discussion 854. PubMed ID: 14744347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antegrade pyelography versus unenhanced multidetector CT in the assessment of urinary-tract stones after percutaneous nephrostomy insertion: a prospective blinded study. Halachmi S; Ghersin E; Ginesin Y; Meretyk S J Endourol; 2007 May; 21(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 17523898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of unenhanced helical computerized tomography findings and renal obstruction determined by furosemide 99m technetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic scintirenography for patients with acute renal colic. Bird VG; Gomez-Marin O; Leveillee RJ; Sfakianakis GN; Rivas LA; Amendola MA J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1597-603. PubMed ID: 11912371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. Eisner BH; Kambadakone A; Monga M; Anderson JK; Thoreson AA; Lee H; Dretler SP; Sahani DV J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1710-5. PubMed ID: 19230922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prospective Comparative Study of Color Doppler Ultrasound with Twinkling and Noncontrast Computerized Tomography for the Evaluation of Acute Renal Colic. Abdel-Gawad M; Kadasne RD; Elsobky E; Ali-El-Dein B; Monga M J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):757-62. PubMed ID: 27063853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]