192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14642938)
1. [Routine use of ST-segment of fetal electrocardiogram for monitoring labor. A year's experience (preliminary results)].
Haberstich R; Vayssière C; David E; Sebahoun V; Schmitt B; Langer B; Nisand I
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Oct; 31(10):820-6. PubMed ID: 14642938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ST waveform analysis vs cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Blix E; Brurberg KG; Reierth E; Reinar LM; Øian P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):437-448. PubMed ID: 38093630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to cardiotocography to predict fetal acidosis in labor--a multi-center, case controlled study.
Norén H; Luttkus AK; Stupin JH; Blad S; Arulkumaran S; Erkkola R; Luzietti R; Visser GH; Yli B; Rosén KG
J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 17685855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal electrocardiogram ST-segment analysis and prediction of neonatal acidosis.
Vayssiere C; Haberstich R; Sebahoun V; David E; Roth E; Langer B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 May; 97(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 17368461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
Westerhuis ME; Moons KG; van Beek E; Bijvoet SM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Porath MM; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Willekes C; Kwee A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal ST segment heart rate analysis in labor: improvement of intervention criteria using interpolated base deficit.
Mansano RZ; Beall MH; Ross MG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jan; 20(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17437199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Amer-Wåhlin I; Hellsten C; Norén H; Hagberg H; Herbst A; Kjellmer I; Lilja H; Lindoff C; Månsson M; Mårtensson L; Olofsson P; Sundström A; Marsál K
Lancet; 2001 Aug; 358(9281):534-8. PubMed ID: 11520523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiotocography combined with ST analysis versus cardiotocography combined with fetal blood sampling in deliveries with abnormal CTG: a randomized trial.
Victor SF; Bach DBB; Hvelplund AC; Nickelsen C; Lyndrup J; Wilken-Jensen C; Scharff LJ; Weber T; Secher NJ; Krebs L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 35701639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined cardiotocographic and ST event analysis: A review.
Amer-Wahlin I; Kwee A
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():48-61. PubMed ID: 26206514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to CTG. A multi-center, observational study.
Luttkus AK; Norén H; Stupin JH; Blad S; Arulkumaran S; Erkkola R; Hagberg H; Lenstrup C; Visser GH; Tamazian O; Yli B; Rosén KG; Dudenhausen JW
J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(6):486-94. PubMed ID: 15576269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
Timonen S; Holmberg K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.
Ignatov PN; Lutomski JE
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():91-7. PubMed ID: 27567534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ST segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram plus electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labor and its relationship to umbilical cord arterial blood gases.
Dervaitis KL; Poole M; Schmidt G; Penava D; Natale R; Gagnon R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):879-84. PubMed ID: 15467558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of STAN monitoring in the labour ward.
Ragupathy K; Ismail F; Nicoll AE
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 20604648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study.
Ojala K; Vääräsmäki M; Mäkikallio K; Valkama M; Tekay A
BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 16553653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Potti S; Berghella V
Am J Perinatol; 2012 Sep; 29(8):657-64. PubMed ID: 22639349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).
Kuah S; Simpson B; Salter A; Matthews G; Louise J; Bednarz J; Chandraharan E; Symonds I; McPhee A; Mol BW; Turnbull D; Wilkinson C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):462-470. PubMed ID: 37289946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial.
Puertas A; Góngora J; Valverde M; Revelles L; Manzanares S; Carrillo MP
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():213-217. PubMed ID: 30731334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 25040705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
