These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14644304)

  • 1. An investigation into low mail survey response rates of information technology users in health care organizations.
    Hikmet N; Chen SK
    Int J Med Inform; 2003 Dec; 72(1-3):29-34. PubMed ID: 14644304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving Response Rates and Representation of Hard-to-Reach Groups in Family Experience Surveys.
    Toomey SL; Elliott MN; Zaslavsky AM; Quinn J; Klein DJ; Wagner S; Thomson C; Wu M; Onorato S; Schuster MA
    Acad Pediatr; 2019; 19(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 30056223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone.
    Couper MP; Peytchev A; Strecher VJ; Rothert K; Anderson J
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e16. PubMed ID: 17567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
    Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
    Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mail follow-up of chronic diseases in northeast Thailand.
    Sitthi-Amorn C; Tussaniyom S; Soontrapa S; Vongsangnak V; Sonpanya N
    Int J Epidemiol; 1986 Jun; 15(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 3721689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Response bias in a population postal survey on Health-Related Quality of Life (sf-12v2)].
    Carpe Carpe B; Hernando Arizaleta L; Monteagudo Piqueras O; Abellán Perpiñán JM; Palomar Rodríguez JA; Alonso J
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 25028301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elderly nonrespondents to a mail survey: a telephone follow-up.
    Strayer M; Kuthy R; Sutton S
    Spec Care Dentist; 1993; 13(6):245-8. PubMed ID: 8042133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
    McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys.
    Siemiatycki J; Campbell S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Aug; 120(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 6465127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
    VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey postal questionnaire: optimising response and dealing with non-response.
    Curtis EA; Redmond RA
    Nurse Res; 2009; 16(2):76-88. PubMed ID: 19241908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey.
    Feveile H; Olsen O; Hogh A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():27. PubMed ID: 17592653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors relating to participation in follow-up to the 45 and up study in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal individuals.
    Gubhaju L; Banks E; Macniven R; Joshy G; McNamara BJ; Bauman A; Eades SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():53. PubMed ID: 27169779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response bias: effect on outcomes evaluation by mail surveys after total knee arthroplasty.
    Kim J; Lonner JH; Nelson CL; Lotke PA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 14711940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumers' characteristics associated with the use of mail pharmacy services in the United States: Findings from the 2015 National Consumer Survey on the Medication Experience.
    Rashrash ME; Tomaszewski DM; Schommer JC; Brown LM
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2017; 57(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 27838390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods.
    Jones R; Pitt N
    Occup Med (Lond); 1999 Nov; 49(8):556-8. PubMed ID: 10658310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User-experience surveys with maternity services: a randomized comparison of two data collection models.
    Bjertnaes OA; Iversen HH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Aug; 24(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 22687704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members.
    Fowler FJ; Gallagher PM; Stringfellow VL; Zaslavsky AM; Thompson JW; Cleary PD
    Med Care; 2002 Mar; 40(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 11880792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mail versus telephone surveys on mammography utilization among women 50-75 years old.
    Polednak AP; Lane DS; Burg MA
    Med Care; 1991 Mar; 29(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 1997753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.