These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1464579)

  • 21. Psychophysical assessment of the level-dependent representation of high-frequency spectral notches in the peripheral auditory system.
    Alves-Pinto A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):409-21. PubMed ID: 18646986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mapping auditory nerve firing density using high-level compound action potentials and high-pass noise masking.
    Earl BR; Chertoff ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):337-52. PubMed ID: 22280596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Properties of the derived cochlear action potential during tonal forward masking in guinea pigs].
    Al'tman IaA; Nikitin NI
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 1999 Jun; 85(6):751-66. PubMed ID: 10511996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Location-specific components of the gross cochlear action potential: an assessment of the validity of the high-pass masking technique by cochlear nerve fibre recording in the cat.
    Evans EF; Elberling C
    Audiology; 1982; 21(3):204-27. PubMed ID: 7092725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Recovery from adaptation in human compound action potential following forward masking].
    Nishino H; Ohashi T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2001 Aug; 104(8):796-804. PubMed ID: 11558156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Noise improves transfer of near-threshold, phase-locked activity of the cochlear nerve: evidence for stochastic resonance?
    Henry KR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1999 Jun; 184(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 10418154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Masked cochlear whole-nerve response intensity functions altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.
    Dolan DF; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1081-6. PubMed ID: 3356813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of signals in modulated and unmodulated noise observed using auditory evoked potentials.
    Androulidakis AG; Jones SJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1783-93. PubMed ID: 16793334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Forward masking of the compound action potential: thresholds for the detection of the N1 peak.
    Relkin EM; Smith RL
    Hear Res; 1991 May; 53(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 2066281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution.
    de Sauvage RC; Cazals Y; Erre JP; Aran JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):616-27. PubMed ID: 6841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of gabapentin on gap detection and forward masking in young and old gerbils.
    Gleich O; Strutz J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 21730860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evoked potential tone-on-tone masking patterns in the chinchilla.
    Robertson LF; Salvi RJ; Poon M; Powers NL
    Am J Otol; 1990 Nov; 11(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 2285064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Compound action potential offset and onset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking in the mongolian gerbil. Effects of varying the intensity of the probe stimulus from 55 to 85 dB SPL.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3680053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers.
    Delgutte B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):791-809. PubMed ID: 2307776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes.
    Parham K; Zhao HB; Kim DO
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 8836205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discrimination of rippled-spectrum patterns in noise: A manifestation of compressive nonlinearity.
    Milekhina ON; Nechaev DI; Klishin VO; Supin AY
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174685. PubMed ID: 28346538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds in bandlimited maskers in subjects with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1049-57. PubMed ID: 11519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Effect of forward masking on evoked potentials of auditory cortex in guinea pigs].
    Petropavlovskaia EA
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2003 Jun; 89(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 12966706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.