These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14646047)

  • 21. Hydro-Jet technology in urologic surgery.
    Shekarriz B
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2005 May; 2(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16288592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ultrasonic technology in revision joint arthroplasty.
    Klapper RC; Caillouette JT; Callaghan JJ; Hozack WJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):147-54. PubMed ID: 1446431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
    Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation of cutting quality and surface roughness in abrasive water jet machining of bone.
    Shakouri E; Abbasi M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Sep; 232(9):850-861. PubMed ID: 30052115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Excessive heat generation during cutting of cement in the Robodoc hip-revision procedure.
    Nogler M; Krismer M; Haid C; Ogon M; Bach C; Wimmer C
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Dec; 72(6):595-9. PubMed ID: 11817874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [An evaluation of the methods used for removal of components and cement in revision hip arthroplasty].
    Erdemli B
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 15347918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cementing technique in femoral resurfacing.
    Beckmann J; Goldapp C; Ringleff K; Schaumburger J; Grifka J; Perlick L
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1317-25. PubMed ID: 18802712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
    Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cement fixation of the femoral component in older patients.
    Lachiewicz PF
    Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():261-5. PubMed ID: 18399589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fracture toughness of steel-fiber-reinforced bone cement.
    Kotha SP; Li C; Schmid SR; Mason JJ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Sep; 70(3):514-21. PubMed ID: 15293326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Evaluation of potential risks of abrasive water jet osteotomy in-vivo].
    Kuhlmann C; Pude F; Bishup C; Krömer S; Kirsch L; Andreae A; Wacker K; Schmolke S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct; 50(10):337-42. PubMed ID: 16300049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: effects of antibiotic prophylaxis systemically and in bone cement on the revision rate of 22,170 primary hip replacements followed 0-14 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesaeter LB; Lie SA; Espehaug B; Furnes O; Vollset SE; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Dec; 74(6):644-51. PubMed ID: 14763692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
    Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.
    Derincek A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 16778665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.