These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14646994)

  • 1. [Classification of observer-groups with cluster analysis and the criteria of visual decision for each group].
    Niimi T; Imai K; Kamegai K; Hioki T; Mano A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Oct; 59(10):1268-76. PubMed ID: 14646994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Grouping of observer's visual characteristics on the basis of difference in the criteria of visual detection and selection of the fittest clustering method:verification of observer's group with radiologist-like visual characteristics].
    Niimi T; Imai K; Kamegai K; Hioki T; Mano A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Apr; 60(4):513-9. PubMed ID: 15159670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method of clustering observers with different visual characteristics.
    Niimi T; Imai K; Ikeda M; Maeda H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 57(1):158-61. PubMed ID: 15975754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Eriksson F; Medin J; Besjakov J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Sandborg M; Almén A; Lanhede B; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 15933082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.
    Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective evaluations of mammographic accreditation phantom images by three observer groups.
    Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jan; 29(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8144336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT.
    Yu L; Chen B; Kofler JM; Favazza CP; Leng S; Kupinski MA; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3990-3999. PubMed ID: 28555878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.
    Swensson RG
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1709-25. PubMed ID: 8946368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-dimensional gray-scale clustering for texture analysis.
    Yoshiura K; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Shibaki N; Ban S; Araki K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 9442601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.
    Gagne RM; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 16485413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Significance of the visual evaluation method using the two-visit method (two-sample preference test suggested by Ferris)].
    Nishihara S; Harada A; Takahashi M; Koike M; Watanabe S; Kohama C; Sanada T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jan; 59(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 12577010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge-based CT iterative reconstruction.
    Eck BL; Fahmi R; Brown KM; Zabic S; Raihani N; Miao J; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6098-111. PubMed ID: 26429285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cluster signal-to-noise analysis for evaluation of the information content in an image.
    Weerawanich W; Shimizu M; Takeshita Y; Okamura K; Yoshida S; Yoshiura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170147. PubMed ID: 28749736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental determination of subjective similarity for pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: observer study results.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt R; Suzuki K; Shiraishi J; Newstead G; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3460-8. PubMed ID: 17022242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Images acquired using 320-MDCT with adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition: visual evaluation of image quality by 10 radiologists using an abdominal phantom.
    Nitta N; Ikeda M; Sonoda A; Nagatani Y; Ohta S; Takahashi M; Murata K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 24370123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward image quality assessment in mammography using model observers: Detection of a calcification-like object.
    Bouwman RW; Mackenzie A; van Engen RE; Broeders MJM; Young KC; Dance DR; den Heeten GJ; Veldkamp WJH
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5726-5739. PubMed ID: 28837225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.
    Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual assessment of the accuracy of retrospective registration of MR and CT images of the brain.
    Fitzpatrick JM; Hill DL; Shyr Y; West J; Studholme C; Maurer CR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):571-85. PubMed ID: 9845313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Development of small adenocarcinoma phantoms for comparison of image quality among various chest X-ray systems].
    Ono K; Akahane K; Hada M; Takano Y; Kai M; Kusama T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Sep; 60(9):1301-7. PubMed ID: 15459566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Honey I; Blake P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5743-57. PubMed ID: 16306665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.