BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14648101)

  • 1. Low-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in two species of kangaroo rats: implications for auditory sensitivity.
    Shaffer LA; Long GR
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 14648101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Species-specific footdrumming in kangaroo rats: Dipodomys ingens, D. deserti, D. spectabilis.
    Randall JA
    Anim Behav; 1997 Nov; 54(5):1167-75. PubMed ID: 9398370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical responses to the 2f1-f2 combination tone measured indirectly using magnetoencephalography.
    Purcell DW; Ross B; Picton TW; Pantev C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):992-1003. PubMed ID: 17672647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth curves in neonates.
    Barbosa TA; Durante AS; Granato L
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2014; 60(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 25650862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-frequency modulated quadratic and cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Drexl M; Gürkov R; Krause E
    Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):91-101. PubMed ID: 22465462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
    Mills DM
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contralateral inhibition of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in children with auditory processing disorders.
    Butler BE; Purcell DW; Allen P
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):530-9. PubMed ID: 21751943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and pure tone audiometry in occupational screening for auditory deficit due to noise exposure.
    Wooles N; Mulheran M; Bray P; Brewster M; Banerjee AR
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Dec; 129(12):1174-81. PubMed ID: 26549131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
    Dreher A; Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
    Fetterman BL
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The influence of gender on otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects].
    Namysłowski G; Lisowska G; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Orecka B; Czecior E
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2007; 61(5):792-5. PubMed ID: 18552021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss].
    Schlögel H; Stephan K; Böheim K; Welzl-Müller K
    HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7890546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Otoacoustic distortion products in adults with normal hearing].
    Simoncelli C; Molini E; Ricci G; Capolunghi B; Alunni N
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1995 Apr; 15(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 8928654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.