324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14648416)
1. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Durup J; Pless TK; Mortensen MB
Endoscopy; 2003 Dec; 35(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 14648416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The substitution of endoscopic ultrasonography for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: implications for service development and training.
Sahel J; Barthet M; Gasmi M
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Mar; 16(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 15195892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for suspected bilio-pancreatic disease: should the endoscopist take a second look?
Wehrmann T; Eckardt AJ; Riphaus A
Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 51(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 23417365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies.
Carlos RC; Scheiman JM; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR; Fendrick AM
Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.
Kondo S; Isayama H; Akahane M; Toda N; Sasahira N; Nakai Y; Yamamoto N; Hirano K; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Ohtomo K; Omata M
Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 15837409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?
Mesenas SJ
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 16565761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology.
Mariani A; Arcidiacono PG; Curioni S; Giussani A; Testoni PA
Dig Liver Dis; 2009 Oct; 41(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 19278909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The usefulness of MRCP in the initial diagnosis of the biliary and pancreatic diseases compared with ERCP].
Iwano M; Mukai H; Mizuma Y; Takino T; Ashihara T; Ueda T; Matumura S; Fujita T; Takano Y; Fujiwara H; Watanabe A; Masuzawa A
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2880-4. PubMed ID: 9847614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne DH; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [New diagnostic strategies in biliary-pancreatic diseases].
Devière J; Matos C
Rev Med Brux; 2000 Sep; 21(4):A314-7. PubMed ID: 11068486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.
Arguedas MR; Dupont AW; Wilcox CM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Owens GR; Shutz SM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study.
Pungpapong S; Wallace MB; Woodward TA; Noh KW; Raimondo M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17198070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
