These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14648964)

  • 1. Comparison of different wound dressings on cultured human fibroblasts and collagen lattices.
    Viennet C; Bride J; Gabiot AC; Humbert P
    J Wound Care; 2003 Nov; 12(10):385-90. PubMed ID: 14648964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulation of the proliferation of human dermal fibroblasts in vitro by a lipidocolloid dressing.
    Bernard FX; Barrault C; Juchaux F; Laurensou C; Apert L
    J Wound Care; 2005 May; 14(5):215-20. PubMed ID: 15909437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of the cytotoxicity of silver-based dressings in monolayer cell, tissue explant, and animal models.
    Burd A; Kwok CH; Hung SC; Chan HS; Gu H; Lam WK; Huang L
    Wound Repair Regen; 2007; 15(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 17244325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a wound dressing composed of hyaluronic acid and collagen sponge with epidermal growth factor.
    Kondo S; Kuroyanagi Y
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2012; 23(5):629-43. PubMed ID: 21375805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of different wound dressings on cell viability and proliferation.
    Paddle-Ledinek JE; Nasa Z; Cleland HJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jun; 117(7 Suppl):110S-118S; discussion 119S-120S. PubMed ID: 16799377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of non-adhering dressings on promotion of fibroblast proliferation and wound healing in vitro.
    Wiegand C; Abel M; Hipler UC; Elsner P
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4320. PubMed ID: 30867534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hydrocoll: a 'new breed' of hydrocolloid wound dressing.
    Williams C
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Nov 26-Dec 9; 7(21):1337-40. PubMed ID: 10076210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Punch-wounded, fibroblast populated collagen matrices: a novel approach for studying cytoskeletal changes in three dimensions by confocal laser scanning microscopy.
    Baschong W; Sütterlin R; Aebi U
    Eur J Cell Biol; 1997 Mar; 72(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 9084981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs.
    Gokoo C; Burhop K
    Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of a DACC dressing on the growth properties and proliferation rate of cultured fibroblasts.
    Falk P; Ivarsson ML
    J Wound Care; 2012 Jul; 21(7):327-8, 330-2. PubMed ID: 22886332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urgotul: alternative to conventional non-adherence dressings.
    Benbow M
    Br J Nurs; 2002 Jan 24-Feb 13; 11(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 11823742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing wound care with a new lipido-colloid dressing (Urgotul Duo).
    Meaume S; Ourabah Z; Charru P; Meyer P; Perez J; Sauvadet A; Bohbot S
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Mar 22-Apr 11; 16(6):S4, S6, S8 passim. PubMed ID: 17505400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro evaluation of the cell toxicity of honey and silver dressings.
    Du Toit DF; Page BJ
    J Wound Care; 2009 Sep; 18(9):383-9. PubMed ID: 19789475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moist environment for healing: matching the dressing to the wound.
    Alvarez O
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():64-83. PubMed ID: 3074811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cytocompatibility of hydrocolloid dressings.
    Agren M
    J Wound Care; 1997 Jun; 6(6):272-4. PubMed ID: 9274263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
    Hermans MH
    Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytotoxicity testing of wound dressings using methylcellulose cell culture.
    van Luyn MJ; van Wachem PB; Nieuwenhuis P; Jonkman MF
    Biomaterials; 1992; 13(5):267-75. PubMed ID: 1600028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical evaluation of Urgotul to treat acute and chronic wounds.
    Benbow M; Iosson G
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Jan 22-Feb 11; 13(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 14997068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.