These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14650286)

  • 1. [Sensitivity of abdominal radiography without preparation compared with computed tomography in the assessment of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy].
    Pires C; Machet F; Dahmani L; Irani J; Dore B
    Prog Urol; 2003 Sep; 13(4):581-4. PubMed ID: 14650286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography.
    Osman Y; El-Tabey N; Refai H; Elnahas A; Shoma A; Eraky I; Kenawy M; El-Kapany H
    J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):198-200; discussion 200. PubMed ID: 18001795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Park J; Hong B; Park T; Park HK
    J Endourol; 2007 Jul; 21(7):684-7. PubMed ID: 17705749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.
    Pearle MS; Watamull LM; Mullican MA
    J Urol; 1999 Jul; 162(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10379731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy; sensitivities of different imaging methods in renal stone detection.
    Lehtoranta K; Mankinen P; Taari K; Rannikko S; Lehtonen T; Salo J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1995; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 7645910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Which is the best performing imaging method for demonstrating residual renal calculi?].
    Gaucher O; Cormier L; Deneuville M; Régent D; Mangin P; Hubert J
    Prog Urol; 1998 Sep; 8(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 9834510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is computed tomography mandatory for the detection of residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
    Sountoulides P; Metaxa L; Cindolo L
    J Endourol; 2013 Nov; 27(11):1341-8. PubMed ID: 23590513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National Imaging Trends after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
    Dai JC; Ahn JS; Holt SK; May PC; Sorensen MD; Harper JD
    J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 29409907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography.
    Jackman SV; Potter SR; Regan F; Jarrett TW
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):308-10. PubMed ID: 10893571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complications, Re-Intervention Rates, and Natural History of Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
    Emmott AS; Brotherhood HL; Paterson RF; Lange D; Chew BH
    J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 29037066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrograde vs. antegrade fl exible nephroscopy for detection of residual fragments following PNL: A prospective study with computerized tomography control.
    Gökce Mİ; Gülpinar O; Ibiş A; Karaburun M; Kubilay E; Süer E
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(3):581-587. PubMed ID: 30901169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of medical management on recurrent stone formation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Kang DE; Maloney MM; Haleblian GE; Springhart WP; Honeycutt EF; Eisenstein EL; Marguet CG; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1785-8; discussion 1788-9. PubMed ID: 17437820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Primary percutaneous approach in staghorn kidney calculus].
    Ponthieu A; Basile P; Lorca J; Ivaldi A
    Prog Urol; 1995 Feb; 5(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 7719363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External validation of a preoperative renal stone grading system: reproducibility and inter-rater concordance of the Guy's stone score using preoperative computed tomography and rigorous postoperative stone-free criteria.
    Ingimarsson JP; Dagrosa LM; Hyams ES; Pais VM
    Urology; 2014 Jan; 83(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 24210568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticular calculi: a novel single stage approach.
    Kim SC; Kuo RL; Tinmouth WW; Watkins S; Lingeman JE
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1194-8. PubMed ID: 15758742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional CT scan stone reconstruction for the planning of percutaneous surgery in a morbidly obese patient.
    Buchholz NP
    Urol Int; 2000; 65(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10965302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.
    Harraz AM; Osman Y; El-Nahas AR; Elsawy AA; Fakhreldin I; Mahmoud O; El-Assmy A; Shokeir AA
    World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1241-1246. PubMed ID: 28013344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric population.
    Al-Shammari AM; Al-Otaibi K; Leonard MP; Hosking DH
    J Urol; 1999 Nov; 162(5):1721-4. PubMed ID: 10524922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of an upper pole calix stone in a transplanted kidney].
    Munk AK; Seif C; Renders L; Jünemann KP; Braun PM
    Aktuelle Urol; 2007 Nov; 38(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 17987538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis and management of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy residual stone fragments.
    Skolarikos A; Papatsoris AG
    J Endourol; 2009 Oct; 23(10):1751-5. PubMed ID: 19747041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.