These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14650286)

  • 81. Simple trigonometry on computed tomography helps in planning renal access.
    Bilen CY; Koçak B; Kitirci G; Danaci M; Sarikaya S
    Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):242-5; discussion 245. PubMed ID: 17826479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for removal of a calcified intra-renal artillery shell fragment.
    Naeem I; Masood J; Buchholz N
    J R Army Med Corps; 2009 Mar; 155(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 19817086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Modification of the technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the morbidly obese patient.
    Curtis R; Thorpe AC; Marsh R
    Br J Urol; 1997 Jan; 79(1):138-40. PubMed ID: 9043520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Giant renal calculus in a horseshoe kidney presenting as an abdominal lump.
    Singh O; Gupta SS; Singh J; Hasan SU
    Urol Res; 2011 Dec; 39(6):503-7. PubMed ID: 21249492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Splenic injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a case report with novel management technique.
    Desai AC; Jain S; Benway BM; Grubb RL; Picus D; Figenshau RS
    J Endourol; 2010 Apr; 24(4):541-5. PubMed ID: 20136555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy on a pelvic kidney without any ancillary modalities.
    Atmaca AF; Akbulut Z; Altinova S; Doğan B; Bayrak O; Balbay MD
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2007; 39(3):723-5. PubMed ID: 17080298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Editorial Comment on: How Reliable Is the Intraoperative Assessment of Residual Fragments During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Prospective Study by Nevo et al.
    Scotland KB; Chew BH
    J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):476. PubMed ID: 29747542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Contemporary assessment of renal stone complexity using cross-sectional imaging.
    Motamedinia P; Okhunov Z; Okeke Z; Smith AD
    Curr Urol Rep; 2015 Apr; 16(4):18. PubMed ID: 25691439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Potential for inter-observer and intra-observer variability in x-ray review to establish stone-free rates after lithotripsy.
    Jewett MA; Bombardier C; Caron D; Ryan MR; Gray RR; St Louis EL; Witchell SJ; Kumra S; Psihramis KE
    J Urol; 1992 Mar; 147(3):559-62. PubMed ID: 1538428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Rapid prototyping model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy training.
    Bruyère F; Leroux C; Brunereau L; Lermusiaux P
    J Endourol; 2008 Jan; 22(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 18177240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91.
    Scotland KB; Chew BH
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):920. PubMed ID: 29790363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Re: Safety and efficacy of supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients. A. R. el-Nahas, A. A. Shokeir, M. R. el-Kenawy, A. M. Shoma, I. Eraky, A. M. el-Assmy, A. M. Ghaly and H. A. el-Kappany. J Urol 2008; 180: 676-680.
    Atmaca AF; Canda AE
    J Urol; 2009 Aug; 182(2):802-3; author reply 803-4. PubMed ID: 19540532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Re: Sofer M et al.: noncontrast computed tomography after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: findings and clinical significance (Urology February 3, 2012 [Epub ahead of print]).
    Goyal NK; Goel A; Mandal S
    Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):740; author reply 740-1. PubMed ID: 22925251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Colon perforation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Rodrigues Netto N; Lemos GC; Fiuza JL
    Urology; 1988 Sep; 32(3):223-4. PubMed ID: 3413914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Clinical Case Discussion: Kidney Stone in a Patient with an Ileal Conduit.
    van Moorselaar RJA; Nieuwenhuijzen JA
    Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Feb; 3(1):13. PubMed ID: 28720357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Editorial Comment on: Complications, Re-Intervention Rates, and Natural History of Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy by Emmott et al.
    Duvdevani M
    J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):33. PubMed ID: 29160109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Place of non contrast thin-slice spiral computed tomography in evaluation of stone-free ratio after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Guner B; Gurbuz C; Canat L; Caskurlu T
    Curr Urol; 2012 Sep; 6(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 24917717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. A complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Sharifiaghdas F; Simforoosh N; Ozhand A
    Urol J; 2010; 7(4):275-7. PubMed ID: 21170859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Use of Volume Rendered, Maximum Intensity Projection Images to Assess Whether the Medial Calyx Synonymous with the Posterior Calyx.
    Pradeepa MG; Sinha M; Krishnamoorthy V
    Urol Int; 2016; 97(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 27160209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Editorial comment.
    Reynolds C; Raman JD
    Urology; 2014 Aug; 84(2):284. PubMed ID: 24837450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.