These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14650770)
1. Reasons to eschew federal lawmaking and embrace common law approaches to genetic discrimination. Hoke C J Law Health; 2001-2002; 16(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 14650770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic discrimination and the law. Natowicz MR; Alper JK; Alper JS Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Mar; 50(3):465-75. PubMed ID: 1342778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic discrimination in the workplace. Miller PS J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):189-97, 178. PubMed ID: 11066876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there a pink slip in my gene? Genetic discrimination in the workplace. Miller PS J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):225-65. PubMed ID: 15015481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex discrimination and the law: why Title 18 must be reformed. Fierst S J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2013; 29(2):319-49. PubMed ID: 23837264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Congress passes bill to ban discrimination based on individuals' genetic makeup. Hampton T JAMA; 2008 Jun; 299(21):2493. PubMed ID: 18523209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic testing and discrimination. How can we protect job and insurance policy applicants from negative test consequences? Tauer CA Health Prog; 2001; 82(2):48-53, 71. PubMed ID: 11299881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal genetic nondiscrimination legislation: the new "right" and the race to protect DNA at the local, state, and federal level. Hathaway KA Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2002; 52(1):133-77. PubMed ID: 16493794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic discrimination in the workplace. Miller PS Genet Med; 2001; 3(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 11388754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic discrimination. Why Congress must ban genetic testing in the workplace. Krumm J J Leg Med; 2002 Dec; 23(4):491-521. PubMed ID: 12501839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. GINA: making it safe to know what's in your genes. Honey K J Clin Invest; 2008 Jul; 118(7):2369. PubMed ID: 18596906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is GINA worth the wait? Rothstein MA J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 18315769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic discrimination and the need for federal legislation. Quick JJ J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 16538803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. California's Proposition 69: a dangerous precedent for criminal DNA databases. Simoncelli T; Steinhardt B J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):279-93. PubMed ID: 16083087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eugenics and genetic discrimination. Holtzman NA; Rothstein MA Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Mar; 50(3):457-9. PubMed ID: 1531726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Advocates, legislators gear up for battle in the fight to keep genetic information, testing secure from employers, insurers. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(14):6-7, 12, 14 passim. PubMed ID: 17444260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]