These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14650770)

  • 21. Genetic disability: a modest proposal to modify the ADA to protect against some forms of genetic discrimination.
    Chorpening J
    North Carol Law Rev; 2004 May; 82(4):1441-81. PubMed ID: 16437812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An equality paradigm for preventing genetic discrimination.
    Silvers A; Stein MA
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 55(5):1341-95. PubMed ID: 15732209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genetic justice: discrimination by employers and insurance companies based on predictive genetic information.
    Ellis AM
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 2003; 34(4):1071-99. PubMed ID: 15568280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. At-risk for cancer: genetic discrimination in the workplace.
    Jacobs LA
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1998 Apr; 25(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 9568603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genetic discrimination. Individual protection legislation stalls in Congress.
    Whitcomb DJ
    AWHONN Lifelines; 2004; 8(5):414-6. PubMed ID: 15560617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic testing and discrimination: how private is your information?
    Slaughter LM
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17165231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bill seeking to ban DNA discrimination isn't really necessary.
    Begley S
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2004 Feb; ():B1. PubMed ID: 15580696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the impact of the ADA.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2005; 16(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15678018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Whose genetic information is it anyway? A legal analysis of the effects that mapping the human genome will have on privacy rights and genetic discrimination.
    McLochlin DL
    John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):609-46. PubMed ID: 16331878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Advancing civil rights, the next generation: the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 and beyond.
    Tan MH
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2009; 19(1):63-119. PubMed ID: 19459538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Constitutional classifications and the "gay gene".
    Becker S
    J Law Health; 2001-2002; 16(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 14650766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Employment discrimination implications of genetic screening in the workplace under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act.
    Canter EF
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 10(3):323-47. PubMed ID: 6534190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Senate sends to House a bill on safeguarding genetic privacy.
    Stolberg SG
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A12. PubMed ID: 14610769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genetic discrimination.
    Billings PR
    Healthc Forum J; 1993; 36(5):35-7. PubMed ID: 10171739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preventing wrongful discharge: know your facts.
    Moushon MA; Asher GE
    Nurs Manage; 2007 Jun; 38(6):18, 20, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 17538457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The secrets of the genome revealed: threats to genetic privacy.
    Doot GM
    Wayne Law Rev; 1991; 37(3):1615-45. PubMed ID: 11659542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. AIDS in the workplace. Handicap discrimination laws and related statutes.
    Wilson BL; Wingo KL
    J Leg Med; 1988 Dec; 9(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 2977401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
    Coelho T
    Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. EEOC v. BNSF: the risks and rewards of genetic exceptionalism.
    Fink S
    Washburn Law J; 2003; 42(3):525-34. PubMed ID: 15114998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Executive Order 13145 of February 8, 2000: to prohibit discrimination in federal employment based on genetic information.
    Clinton WJ
    Fed Regist; 2000 Feb; 65(28):6877-80. PubMed ID: 11660672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.