These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14651703)

  • 1. JAN Forum: your views and letters. Response to: Watson's guest editorial 'Scientific methods are the only credible way forward for nursing research', Journal of advanced Nursing 43, 219-220.
    Draper J; Draper P
    J Adv Nurs; 2003 Dec; 44(5):546-7. PubMed ID: 14651703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. JAN Forum: your views and letters. Response to: Watson's guest editorial 'Scientific methods are the only credible way forward for nursing research', Journal of advanced Nursing 43, 219-220.
    Payne S; Seymour J; Ingleton C
    J Adv Nurs; 2003 Dec; 44(5):547-8. PubMed ID: 14651704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response to: Watson's guest editorial, 'Scientific methods are the only credible way forward for nursing research', Journal of Advanced Nursing (2003) 43, pp. 219-220, and subsequent JAN forum pieces, 44, pp. 546-548.
    Paley J
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 May; 46(4):453-4. PubMed ID: 15117356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to: 'Editorial: use and abuse of statistics in nursing research' by H.O. Dickinson (2002) Journal of Advanced Nursing 39, 405-407.
    Watson R; Deary IJ
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Dec; 40(6):649; author reply 649-50. PubMed ID: 12473043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific methods are the only credible way forward for nursing research.
    Watson R
    J Adv Nurs; 2003 Aug; 43(3):219-20. PubMed ID: 12859779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to: J. Paley's JAN Forum (2002) Journal of Advanced Nursing 39, 103-105.
    Deary V; Hoogbruin AL
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Dec; 40(6):651; author reply 651. PubMed ID: 12473044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of statistical methods in the Journal of Advanced Nursing.
    Anthony D
    J Adv Nurs; 1996 Nov; 24(5):1089-94. PubMed ID: 8933272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Database research.
    Kraft MR
    SCI Nurs; 2003; 20(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 14626018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analysis of topics and collection of material. Continuation of the Didactic Series of the Osterreichische Krankenpflegezeitschrift].
    Bruckler I; Huppmann I
    Osterr Krankenpflegez; 1999 Jan; 52(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 10076412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to two JAN Forum commentaries on A critique of concept analysis, P. Draper, (2014). Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70: 1207-1208.
    Draper P
    J Adv Nurs; 2014 Dec; 70(12):2970. PubMed ID: 25378186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "n" and the pursuit of relevance.
    Bryan-Brown CW; Dracup K
    Am J Crit Care; 1994 Jul; 3(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 7920951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. JAN Forum response to Jacinta Kelly on Clark A.M. & Thompson D.R. (2013) Succeeding in research: insights from management and game theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing 69(6), 1221-1223.
    Clark AM; Thompson DR
    J Adv Nurs; 2014 Oct; 70(10):2404-5. PubMed ID: 25209752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A response to: "Misrepresenting random sampling? A systematic review of research papers' by G.R. Williamson (2003) Journal of Advanced Nursing 44, 278-288, from Roger Watson.
    Watson R
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Apr; 46(2):220-1; author reply 222-3. PubMed ID: 15056336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A response to: "Misrepresenting random sampling? A systematic review of research papers' by G.R. Williamson (2003) Journal of Advanced Nursing 44, 278-288, from Seamus Cowman and Ronan M. Conroy.
    Cowman S; Conroy RM
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Apr; 46(2):221-2; author reply 222-3. PubMed ID: 15056337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nursing research: on what basis?
    Kiikkala I; Munnukka T
    J Adv Nurs; 1994 Feb; 19(2):320-7. PubMed ID: 8188964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of research related to Watson's theory of caring.
    Smith M
    Nurs Sci Q; 2004 Jan; 17(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 14752948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Academic nursing managed to classify various approaches to scientific inquiry.
    Dreher MC
    J Prof Nurs; 2000; 16(6):362. PubMed ID: 11125969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [What type of research in nursing?].
    Poirier-Coutansais G
    Soins Form Pedagog Encadr; 1998; (28):29-31. PubMed ID: 10410083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical power and neonatal nursing research statistics: knowing your "p" from your "SD".
    Holditch-Davis D
    Neonatal Netw; 1990 Sep; 9(2):62-3. PubMed ID: 2392117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The significance of statistical significance.
    Dyer I
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1997 Oct; 13(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 9538712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.