BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14652278)

  • 1. Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population.
    Caplan LS; McQueen DV; Qualters JR; Leff M; Garrett C; Calonge N
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Nov; 12(11 Pt 1):1182-7. PubMed ID: 14652278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
    Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC
    Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Appalachian women.
    Hall HI; Uhler RJ; Coughlin SS; Miller DS
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 11815412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.
    Paskett ED; Tatum CM; Mack DW; Hoen H; Case LD; Velez R
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Sep; 5(9):721-6. PubMed ID: 8877064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast carcinoma screening and risk perception among women at increased risk for breast carcinoma: results from a national survey.
    Sabatino SA; Burns RB; Davis RB; Phillips RS; Chen YH; McCarthy EP
    Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2338-46. PubMed ID: 15160336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of self-reported breast screening information in a survey of lower income women.
    Vacek PM; Mickey RM; Worden JK
    Prev Med; 1997; 26(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 9144751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of self-reported Pap smear history in Norwegian women.
    Klungsøyr O; Nygård M; Skare G; Eriksen T; Nygård JF
    J Med Screen; 2009; 16(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 19564522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associations in breast and colon cancer screening behavior in women.
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Patterson SK; Bernstein SJ
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 15831418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding breast and cervical cancer screening in selected ethnocultural groups in Northwestern Ontario.
    Steven D; Fitch M; Dhaliwal H; Kirk-Gardner R; Sevean P; Jamieson J; Woodbeck H
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2004; 31(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 15017446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008.
    Armour BS; Thierry JM; Wolf LA
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):406-14. PubMed ID: 19879454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Women's compliance with public health guidelines for mammograms and pap tests in Canada and the United States: an analysis of data from the Joint Canada/United States Survey Of Health.
    Blackwell DL; Martinez ME; Gentleman JF
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 18182305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer screening in Rockland County, New York: a survey of attitudes and behaviors.
    Goodwin SS; Visintainer PF; Facelle J; Falvo CE
    Ethn Dis; 2006; 16(2):428-34. PubMed ID: 17682245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adherence characteristics after abnormal screening results between mammogram and Papanicolaou test groups.
    Fang SY; Shu BC
    Cancer Nurs; 2009; 32(6):437-45. PubMed ID: 19816157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer?
    Fenton JJ; Barton MB; Geiger AM; Herrinton LJ; Rolnick SJ; Harris EL; Barlow WE; Reisch LM; Fletcher SW; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):67-71. PubMed ID: 16287888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in abnormal cancer screening results in the United States of America.
    Yabroff KR; Freedman A; Brown ML; Ballard-Barbash R; McNeel T; Taplin S
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 17626704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior.
    Baier M; Calonge N; Cutter G; McClatchey M; Schoentgen S; Hines S; Marcus A; Ahnen D
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Feb; 9(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 10698488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social support and cervical and breast cancer screening in Argentinean women from a rural population.
    Gamarra CJ; Paz EP; Griep RH
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Awareness of breast and cervical cancer risk factors and screening behaviours among nurses in rural region of Turkey.
    Yaren A; Ozkilinc G; Guler A; Oztop I
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2008 May; 17(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 18419631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can breast and cervical cancer screening visits be used to enhance colorectal cancer screening?
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Ellis J; Bernstein SJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):769-76. PubMed ID: 17411698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.