146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14652552)
1. Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction.
Hünerbein M; Stroszczynski C; Ulmer C; Handke T; Felix R; Schlag PM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Dec; 58(6):853-8. PubMed ID: 14652552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Navigator-triggered isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstructions: comparison with direct cholangiography.
Choi JY; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SH; Lee MW; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 18050328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL
Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary obstruction.
Magnuson TH; Bender JS; Duncan MD; Ahrendt SA; Harmon JW; Regan F
J Am Coll Surg; 1999 Jul; 189(1):63-71; discussion 71-2. PubMed ID: 10401742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MDCT cholangiography with volume rendering for the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction.
Ahmetoğlu A; Koşucu P; Kul S; Dinç H; Sari A; Arslan M; Alhan E; Gümele HR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1327-32. PubMed ID: 15505298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings.
Stroszczynski C; Hunerbein M
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15965779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biliary sludge after liver transplantation: 1. Imaging findings and efficacy of various imaging procedures.
Barton P; Maier A; Steininger R; Mühlbacher F; Lechner G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 7726038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results.
Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Messina A; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Passariello R
Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 8797971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures.
Rösch T; Meining A; Frühmorgen S; Zillinger C; Schusdziarra V; Hellerhoff K; Classen M; Helmberger H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jun; 55(7):870-6. PubMed ID: 12024143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiography.
Saad WE; Ginat D
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jun; 11(2):74-89. PubMed ID: 18922453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography.
Morimoto K; Shimoi M; Shirakawa T; Aoki Y; Choi S; Miyata Y; Hara K
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):578-80. PubMed ID: 1561373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. US, MRCP, CCT and ERCP: a comparative study in 131 patients with suspected biliary obstruction.
Ferrari FS; Fantozzi F; Tasciotti L; Vigni F; Scotto F; Frasci P
Med Sci Monit; 2005 Mar; 11(3):MT8-18. PubMed ID: 15735576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
Textor HJ; Flacke S; Pauleit D; Keller E; Neubrand M; Terjung B; Gieseke J; Scheurlen C; Sauerbruch T; Schild HH
Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):984-90. PubMed ID: 12471543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction.
Georgopoulos SK; Schwartz LH; Jarnagin WR; Gerdes H; Breite I; Fong Y; Blumgart LH; Kurtz RC
Arch Surg; 1999 Sep; 134(9):1002-7. PubMed ID: 10487597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
