BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14652822)

  • 1. Computerized diagnostic decision support system for the classification of preinvasive cervical squamous lesions.
    Price GJ; McCluggage WG; Morrison M ML; McClean G; Venkatraman L; Diamond J; Bharucha H; Montironi R; Bartels PH; Thompson D; Hamilton PW
    Hum Pathol; 2003 Nov; 34(11):1193-203. PubMed ID: 14652822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expert system support using a Bayesian belief network for the classification of endometrial hyperplasia.
    Morrison ML; McCluggage WG; Price GJ; Diamond J; Sheeran MR; Mulholland KM; Walsh MY; Montironi R; Bartels PH; Thompson D; Hamilton PW
    J Pathol; 2002 Jul; 197(3):403-14. PubMed ID: 12115888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
    Keenan SJ; Diamond J; McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Thompson D; Bartels PH; Hamilton PW
    J Pathol; 2000 Nov; 192(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 11054719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN.
    Hopman EH; Voorhorst FJ; Kenemans P; Meyer CJ; Helmerhorst TJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 7622107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis on histological review of cervical punch biopsies from a visual inspection with acetic acid and HPV detection-based screening program.
    Mittal S; Ghosh I; Banerjee D; Singh P; Biswas J; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Ray C; Basu P
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 126(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 24947603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems.
    McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Caughley LM; Date A; Hamilton PW; Thornton CM; Walsh MY
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 49(10):833-5. PubMed ID: 8943751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. p16(INK4a) immunostaining as an alternative to histology review for reliable grading of cervical intraepithelial lesions.
    Dijkstra MG; Heideman DA; de Roy SC; Rozendaal L; Berkhof J; van Krimpen K; van Groningen K; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; van Kemenade FJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):972-7. PubMed ID: 20924035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal evaluation of interobserver and intraobserver agreement of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis among an experienced panel of gynecologic pathologists.
    Cai B; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Ferenczy A; Kurman RJ; Sadow D; Alvarez F; Pearson J; Sings HL; Barr E; Liaw KL
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Dec; 31(12):1854-60. PubMed ID: 18043039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic value and reproducibility of koilocytosis in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Kruse AJ; Baak JP; Helliesen T; Kjellevold KH; Robboy SJ
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jul; 22(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 12819389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy in the interpretation of cervical histology by gynecologic pathologists.
    Parker MF; Zahn CM; Vogel KM; Olsen CH; Miyazawa K; O'Connor DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 100(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 12151150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis.
    Sağlam A; Usubütün A; Dolgun A; Mutter GL; Salman MC; Kurtulan O; Akyol A; Özkan EA; Baykara S; Bülbül D; Calay Z; Eren F; Gümürdülü D; Haberal N; Ilvan Ş; Karaveli Ş; Koyuncuoğlu M; Müezzinoğlu B; Müftüoğlu KH; Özen Ö; Özdemir N; Peştereli E; Ulukuş Ç; Zekioğlu O
    Turk Patoloji Derg; 2017; 1(1):177-191. PubMed ID: 28832077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminating analysis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance of the uterine cervix using nuclear three-dimensional analysis.
    Washiya K; Nakamura M; Mizuki Y; Motoi M; Kobayashi T; Yoshioka H; Watanabe J
    Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 24247299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphological diagnosis of HPV lesions and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is highly reproducible.
    Roteli-Martins CM; Derchain SF; Martinez EZ; Siqueira SA; Alves VA; Syrjänen KJ
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2001; 28(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 11491378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reproducibility of CIN diagnoses among different pathologists: data from histology reviews from a multicenter randomized study.
    Dalla Palma P; Giorgi Rossi P; Collina G; Buccoliero AM; Ghiringhello B; Gilioli E; Onnis GL; Aldovini D; Galanti G; Casadei G; Aldi M; Gomes VV; Giubilato P; Ronco G;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jul; 132(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 19864243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of the histological diagnosis of cervical dysplasia among pathologists from 4 continents.
    Ceballos KM; Chapman W; Daya D; Julian JA; Lytwyn A; McLachlin CM; Elit L
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Jan; 27(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18156983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted diagnosis in colposcopy: results of a preliminary experiment?
    Mehlhorn G; Münzenmayer C; Benz M; Kage A; Beckmann MW; Wittenberg T
    Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 23075899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of p16INK4a expression for the interpretation of uterine cervical biopsies in Kenya.
    Muvunyi TZ; Rohner E; O'Connor S; Kalebi AY; Waweru W; Kairu J; Ochuk W; Smith JS; Muchiri LW
    Pan Afr Med J; 2021; 40():55. PubMed ID: 34795834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic imaging of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia based on hematoxylin and eosin fluorescence.
    Castellanos MR; Szerszen A; Gundry S; Pirog EC; Maiman M; Rajupet S; Gomez JP; Davidov A; Debata PR; Banerjee P; Fata JE
    Diagn Pathol; 2015 Jul; 10():119. PubMed ID: 26204927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. p16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Klaes R; Benner A; Friedrich T; Ridder R; Herrington S; Jenkins D; Kurman RJ; Schmidt D; Stoler M; von Knebel Doeberitz M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2002 Nov; 26(11):1389-99. PubMed ID: 12409715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) Terminology in predicting cervical disease.
    Hammes LS; Naud P; Passos EP; Matos J; Brouwers K; Rivoire W; Syrjänen KJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Jul; 11(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 17596761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.