154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14652822)
21. Conjunctive p16INK4a testing significantly increases accuracy in diagnosing high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Bergeron C; Ordi J; Schmidt D; Trunk MJ; Keller T; Ridder R;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Mar; 133(3):395-406. PubMed ID: 20154278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interobserver agreement in the reporting of cervical biopsy specimens obtained from women screened by visual inspection with acetic acid and hybrid capture 2.
Basu P; Kamal M; Ray C; Bhat D; Ghosh I; Mittal S; Chatterjee S; Samaddar A; Biswas J
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 Sep; 32(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 23896715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Immunostaining for p16INK4a used as a conjunctive tool improves interobserver agreement of the histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Horn LC; Reichert A; Oster A; Arndal SF; Trunk MJ; Ridder R; Rassmussen OF; Bjelkenkrantz K; Christiansen P; Eck M; Lorey T; Skovlund VR; Ruediger T; Schneider V; Schmidt D
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Apr; 32(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 18223479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues.
Malpica A; Matisic JP; Niekirk DV; Crum CP; Staerkel GA; Yamal JM; Guillaud MH; Cox DD; Atkinson EN; Adler-Storthz K; Poulin NM; Macaulay CA; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S38-52. PubMed ID: 16183106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wojciech R
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Aug; 82(8):607-11. PubMed ID: 21957606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Gallwas JK; Turk L; Stepp H; Mueller S; Ochsenkuehn R; Friese K; Dannecker C
Lasers Surg Med; 2011 Mar; 43(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 21412804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Expert system support using Bayesian belief networks in the diagnosis of fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens of the breast.
Hamilton PW; Anderson N; Bartels PH; Thompson D
J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 47(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 8027370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.
Cong Q; Xiao J; Tao X; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 32324695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance report: a national survey.
Confortini M; Carozzi F; Dalla Palma P; Ghiringhello B; Parisio F; Prandi S; Ronco G; Ciatto S; Montanari G;
Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 14510890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Histologic classification and terminology of precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Hadzić B; Hadzić M; Curcin N
Med Pregl; 1999; 52(3-5):151-5. PubMed ID: 10518401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix: morphology and molecular pathology].
Horn LC; Klostermann K
Pathologe; 2011 Nov; 32 Suppl 2():242-54. PubMed ID: 21909794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. p16INK4a immunohistochemistry in cervical biopsy specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the interobserver agreement.
Reuschenbach M; Wentzensen N; Dijkstra MG; von Knebel Doeberitz M; Arbyn M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Dec; 142(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 25389329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inter- and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using a modified Bethesda grading system.
McCluggage WG; Walsh MY; Thornton CM; Hamilton PW; Date A; Caughley LM; Bharucha H
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Feb; 105(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 9501788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Significance of subclassifying high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions into moderate dysplasia/CIN II versus severe dysplasia/CIN III/CIS in the Bethesda System terminology.
Howell LP; Zhou H; Wu W; Davis R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 May; 30(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15108239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of human telomerase RNA gene in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions: comparison with cytological and human papillomavirus DNA test findings.
Li Y; Ye F; Lü WG; Zeng WJ; Wei LH; Xie X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 May; 20(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 20686384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Observer variability among colposcopists from the West Midlands region.
Etherington IJ; Luesley DM; Shafi MI; Dunn J; Hiller L; Jordan JA
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Dec; 104(12):1380-4. PubMed ID: 9422016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry staining on interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Pacchiarotti A; Galeotti S; Bellardini P; Chini F; Collina G; Dalla Palma P; Ghiringhello B; Maccallini V; Musolino F; Negri G; Pisa R; Sabatucci I; Giorgi Rossi P
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Mar; 141(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 24515764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Creagh T; Bridger JE; Kupek E; Fish DE; Martin-Bates E; Wilkins MJ
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 7706521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Modern biomarkers for precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix : Histological-cytological correlation and use].
Schmidt D
Pathologe; 2016 Nov; 37(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 27638536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]