These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14653354)

  • 41. A Bayesian comparative effectiveness trial in action: developing a platform for multisite study adaptive randomization.
    Brown AR; Gajewski BJ; Aaronson LS; Mudaranthakam DP; Hunt SL; Berry SM; Quintana M; Pasnoor M; Dimachkie MM; Jawdat O; Herbelin L; Barohn RJ
    Trials; 2016 Aug; 17(1):428. PubMed ID: 27577191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomized trials.
    Lee KJ; Thompson SG
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 16279138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of repeated cross-sectional cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2010 Mar; 6(1):Article 11. PubMed ID: 20949127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of methods for analysing cluster randomized trials: an example involving a factorial design.
    Peters TJ; Richards SH; Bankhead CR; Ades AE; Sterne JA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Oct; 32(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 14559762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice.
    Simmonds MC; Higgins JP; Stewart LA; Tierney JF; Clarke MJ; Thompson SG
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 16279144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomized trials: a systematic review.
    Fiero MH; Huang S; Oren E; Bell ML
    Trials; 2016 Feb; 17():72. PubMed ID: 26862034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Randomizing patients by family practice: sample size estimation, intracluster correlation and data analysis.
    Cosby RH; Howard M; Kaczorowski J; Willan AR; Sellors JW
    Fam Pract; 2003 Feb; 20(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 12509376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Meta-analysis of standardised mean differences from randomised trials with treatment-related clustering associated with care providers.
    Walwyn R; Roberts C
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(7):1043-1067. PubMed ID: 27910117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of analytical methods for cluster randomised trials: an example from a primary care setting.
    Mollison J; Simpson JA; Campbell MK; Grimshaw JM
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(6):339-48. PubMed ID: 11234738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A methodological review of non-therapeutic intervention trials employing cluster randomization, 1979-1989.
    Donner A; Brown KS; Brasher P
    Int J Epidemiol; 1990 Dec; 19(4):795-800. PubMed ID: 2084005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.
    Turner EL; Li F; Gallis JA; Prague M; Murray DM
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Jun; 107(6):907-915. PubMed ID: 28426295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach.
    Campbell MK; Mollison J; Steen N; Grimshaw JM; Eccles M
    Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 17(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 10758085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cluster-randomized Studies in Educational Research: Principles and Methodological Aspects.
    Dreyhaupt J; Mayer B; Keis O; Öchsner W; Muche R
    GMS J Med Educ; 2017; 34(2):Doc26. PubMed ID: 28584874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Managing clustering effects and learning effects in the design and analysis of multicentre randomised trials: a survey to establish current practice.
    Conroy EJ; Blazeby JM; Burnside G; Cook JA; Gamble C
    Trials; 2020 May; 21(1):433. PubMed ID: 32460815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Methods for the analysis of incidence rates in cluster randomized trials.
    Bennett S; Parpia T; Hayes R; Cousens S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Aug; 31(4):839-46. PubMed ID: 12177032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Randomized trials involving surgery did not routinely report considerations of learning and clustering effects.
    Conroy EJ; Rosala-Hallas A; Blazeby JM; Burnside G; Cook JA; Gamble C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():27-35. PubMed ID: 30439544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study.
    Bobb JF; Qiu H; Matthews AG; McCormack J; Bradley KA
    Trials; 2020 Mar; 21(1):289. PubMed ID: 32293514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of cluster randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa.
    Isaakidis P; Ioannidis JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 158(9):921-6. PubMed ID: 14585770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An application of a modified constrained randomization process to a practice-based cluster randomized trial to improve colorectal cancer screening.
    Nietert PJ; Jenkins RG; Nemeth LS; Ornstein SM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Mar; 30(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 18977314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of imbalance and intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes when the available number of clusters is fixed in advance.
    Ahn C; Hu F; Skinner CS; Ahn D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Jul; 30(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 19348965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.