These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14655141)

  • 21. Cervical spine bending: a factor confounding whole trunk and lumbar forward bending range of motion.
    Brooks WJ; Patterson MM; Wagner E; Hardigan P
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2012 Jul; 112(7):429-36. PubMed ID: 22802543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Spinal injuries in children and adolescents].
    Stulík J; Pesl T; Kryl J; Vyskocil T; Sebesta P; Havránek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Oct; 73(5):313-20. PubMed ID: 17140512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Normative values for active lumbar range of motion in children.
    Kondratek M; Krauss J; Stiller C; Olson R
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2007; 19(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 17700353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Video analysis of sagittal spinal posture in healthy young and older adults.
    Kuo YL; Tully EA; Galea MP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009; 32(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 19362231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervical spine range of motion in children with posterior occipitocervical arthrodesis.
    Wills BP; Jencikova-Celerin L; Dormans JP
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 17065940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Re: Kolstad F, Nygaard OP, Leivseth G. Segmental motion adjacent to anterior cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine 2007;32:512-7.
    Good C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):2035-6. PubMed ID: 17700454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changes in neck pain and active range of motion after a single thoracic spine manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a case series.
    Fernández-de-las-Peñas C; Palomeque-del-Cerro L; Rodríguez-Blanco C; Gómez-Conesa A; Miangolarra-Page JC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 May; 30(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 17509440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A method to measure cervical spine motion over extended periods of time.
    Syed FI; Oza AL; Vanderby R; Heiderscheit B; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2092-8. PubMed ID: 17762810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamic sagittal flexibility coefficients of the human cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC; Ito S; Panjabi MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jul; 39(4):688-95. PubMed ID: 17140545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Re: Kolstad F, Nygaard OP, Leivseth G. Segmental motion adjacent to anterior cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine 2007;32:512-7.
    Robertson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):2035. PubMed ID: 17700455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical analysis of cervical spine sagittal stiffness characteristics.
    Küçük H
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Sep; 37(9):1283-91. PubMed ID: 17207786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A morphometric investigation on breed-specific features affecting sagittal rotational and lateral bending mobility in the canine cervical spine (c3-c7).
    Breit S; Künzel W
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 15239817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation.
    Lee RY; McGregor AH; Bull AM; Wragg P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Feb; 20(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15621330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
    Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Functional evaluation of the cervical spine after Bryan artificial disc replacement].
    Tian W; Liu B; Li Q; Hu L; Li ZY; Yuan Q; Han X
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 18785527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Muscle strength of the cervical and lumbar spine in triathletes].
    Miltner O; Siebert CH; Müller-Rath R; Kieffer O
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Dec; 148(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 20213602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A pilot study on changes in passive range of motion in the cervical spine, for children aged 0-5 years.
    Öhman AM; Beckung ER
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 29(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 23270403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.