These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14655584)

  • 1. The defence of therapeutic privilege in Australia.
    Mulheron R
    J Law Med; 2003 Nov; 11(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 14655584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.
    Chalmers D; Schwartz R
    Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rogers v. Whitaker.
    Australia. High Court
    Aust Law J; 1993 Jan; 67(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 11648609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Therapeutic Privilege Is No Defence.
    Davison S
    J Law Med; 2019 Apr; 26(3):595-611. PubMed ID: 30958652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Courts as communicators: can doctors learn from judges' decisions?
    Skene L
    J Bioeth Inq; 2004; 1(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16025599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Castell v. De Greef.
    South Africa. Supreme Court, Cape Provincial Division
    S Afr Law Rep; 1994 Feb; 1994(4):408-41. PubMed ID: 12041097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients' rights--why the Australian courts have rejected 'Bolam'.
    Kirby M
    J Med Ethics; 1995 Feb; 21(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 7776350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Malpractice liability for the failure to adequately educate patients: the Australian law of "informed consent" and its implications for American ethics committees.
    Chalmers D; Schwartz R
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 8293226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the value of professional opinion? The current medicolegal application of the "peer professional practice defence" in Australia.
    Mahar PD; Burke JA
    Med J Aust; 2011 Mar; 194(5):253-5. PubMed ID: 21382000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disclosure of material risk as systems-error tragedy: Wallace v Kam (2013) 87 ALJR 648; [2013] HCA 19.
    Faunce T
    J Law Med; 2013 Sep; 21(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 24218781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Australian High Court rules on medical records.
    Cordner S; Ettershank K
    Lancet; 1996 Sep; 348(9030):818. PubMed ID: 11654511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Halley v. Birbiglia.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
    Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Dec; 390():540-50. PubMed ID: 12041108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consent in the 90's.
    Molnar J
    Med Law; 1997; 16(3):567-79. PubMed ID: 9409137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent developments in medical negligence.
    Quest IM
    Int J Med Law; 1980; 1(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 11649434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loss of a chance in medical malpractice litigation: expanding liability of health professionals versus providing justice to those who have lost.
    Meldrum MA
    J Law Med; 2001 Nov; 9(2):200-14. PubMed ID: 12375501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
    Monks SS
    Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fraudulent concealment and the duty to disclose medical mistakes.
    Robertson G
    Alta Law Rev; 1987; 25(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11657367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view.
    Giesen D; Hayes J
    Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion, information & the law: what every doctor needs to know.
    Issues Law Med; 2001; 16(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 11285863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physicians with AIDS: a proposal for efficient disclosure.
    Hertz J
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(2):749-78. PubMed ID: 11659904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.