226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14655942)
1. Inverse treatment planning by physically constrained minimization of a biological objective function.
Stavrev P; Hristov D; Warkentin B; Sham E; Stavreva N; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2948-58. PubMed ID: 14655942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incorporating model parameter uncertainty into inverse treatment planning.
Lian J; Xing L
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2711-20. PubMed ID: 15487755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT.
Zhang X; Liu H; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15191303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beam orientation optimization for IMRT by a hybrid method of the genetic algorithm and the simulated dynamics.
Hou Q; Wang J; Chen Y; Galvin JM
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2360-7. PubMed ID: 14528958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiobiological impact of reduced margins and treatment technique for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Jensen I; Carl J; Lund B; Larsen EH; Nielsen J
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 20488692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A feasible application of constrained optimization in the IMRT system.
Artacho Terrer JM; Nasarre Benedé MA; Bernués del Rio E; Cruz Llanas S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar; 54(3):370-9. PubMed ID: 17355048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of radiobiological effects in intensity modulated proton therapy.
Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):455-65. PubMed ID: 15789592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IMRT: improvement in treatment planning efficiency using NTCP calculation independent of the dose-volume-histogram.
Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Grigorov L; Jiang R; Barnett RB
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1250-8. PubMed ID: 16752559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of forward planning with automated inverse planning for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer without IMRT.
Mendes R; Lavrenkov K; Bedford JL; Henrys A; Ashley S; Brada M
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 16564591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are dose calculations during dose optimization in brachytherapy necessary?
Lahanas M; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2368-75. PubMed ID: 14528959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved critical structure sparing with biologically based IMRT optimization.
Qi XS; Semenenko VA; Li XA
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1790-9. PubMed ID: 19544798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IMRT dose shaping with regionally variable penalty scheme.
Cotrutz C; Xing L
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):544-51. PubMed ID: 12722806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From physical dose constraints to equivalent uniform dose constraints in inverse radiotherapy planning.
Thieke C; Bortfeld T; Niemierko A; Nill S
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2332-9. PubMed ID: 14528955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A particle swarm optimization algorithm for beam angle selection in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Li Y; Yao D; Yao J; Chen W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3491-514. PubMed ID: 16030379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dose-volume-based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans.
Miften MM; Das SK; Su M; Marks LB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(4):1-14. PubMed ID: 15738916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
