These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Federal work force. Can outsiders do better in managing NIH grants? Kaiser J Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1823. PubMed ID: 12649448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list. Kaiser J Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important. Nairn RS; Sweasy JB DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research funding: peer review at NIH. Scarpa T Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):41. PubMed ID: 16400135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Two facets of peer review and the proper role of study sections. Lenard J Account Res; 2006; 13(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 17124762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. NIH needs a makeover. Dey SK Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Revamp for NIH grants. Wadman M Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]