These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14657434)

  • 41. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Biomedical research. The graying of NIH research.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):848-9. PubMed ID: 18988821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Biomedical policy. NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5533):1234. PubMed ID: 11509695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. NIH Grants.
    Ness RB
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 May; 16(5):413. PubMed ID: 16647633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. NIH center grants--PHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Dec; 49(244):49115-7. PubMed ID: 10269293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Research report from the NIH: introduction to the NIH and the NCI director's year 2015 challenge goal.
    Wallner PE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 17411513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. NIH peer review: time for some changes.
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16(5):395. PubMed ID: 9592372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Washington Report. NIH: with friends like that..
    Greenberg DS
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Jun; 302(26):1490-2. PubMed ID: 7374726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. NIH's way of setting priorities endorsed.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6672):116. PubMed ID: 9515947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Restructuring the NIH.
    Thier SO
    N Engl J Med; 1994 May; 330(21):1528-30. PubMed ID: 8164708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. International peer review improved Irish research rankings.
    O'Carroll C
    Nature; 2009 Aug; 460(7258):949. PubMed ID: 19693064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
    Demsey A
    Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1607. PubMed ID: 19779159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Faculty receive million dollar NIH grants to continue their research.
    Elder J; Kneipp S
    Fla Nurse; 2005 Dec; 53(4):28. PubMed ID: 16382773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.