These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. The management of adolescents with neurogenic urinary tract and bowel dysfunction. de Kort LM; Bower WF; Swithinbank LV; Marschall-Kehrel D; de Jong TP; Bauer SB Neurourol Urodyn; 2012 Sep; 31(7):1170-4. PubMed ID: 22460386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The artificial somato-autonomic reflex arch does not improve lower urinary tract function in patients with spinal cord lesions. Rasmussen MM; Rawashdeh YF; Clemmensen D; Tankisi H; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A; Krogh K; Christensen P J Urol; 2015 Feb; 193(2):598-604. PubMed ID: 25158270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Artificial sight: recent developments]. Zeitz O; Keserü M; Hornig R; Richard G Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Mar; 226(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 19294584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Electrical stimulation of the conus medullaris and its effect on the neurogenic bladder. Letellier MA; Moffat NA; Meyer PG Wis Med J; 1978 Feb; 77(2):S 18-9. PubMed ID: 305688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. An implantable neuroprosthesis for restoring bladder and bowel control to patients with spinal cord injuries: a multicenter trial. Creasey GH; Grill JH; Korsten M; U HS; Betz R; Anderson R; Walter J; Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 82(11):1512-9. PubMed ID: 11689969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Principles and indications of electrostimulation of the urinary bladder]. Tanagho EA Urologe A; 1990 Jul; 29(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 2205039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Treatment of the bladder in myelomeningocele]. Mollard P; Viguier JL Neurochirurgie; 1988; 34 Suppl 1():61-6. PubMed ID: 3185851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A new minimally invasive procedure for pudendal nerve stimulation to treat neurogenic bladder: description of the method and preliminary data. Spinelli M; Malaguti S; Giardiello G; Lazzeri M; Tarantola J; Van Den Hombergh U Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 15977260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications. Nag S; Thakor NV Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Jan; 54(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 26753775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Spinal cord stimulation in central neurogenic bladder]. Sarramon JP; Lazorthes Y; Sedan R; Leandri P; Lhez JM Acta Urol Belg; 1979 Jan; 47(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 311994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Experiences with a silastic spigot as a replacement for the urinary sphincters in neurogenic bladder. A preliminary report. Conger K; Mintz M; Haragopal PS Invest Urol; 1972 Nov; 10(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 4640488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. An introduction to operative neuromodulation and functional neuroprosthetics, the new frontiers of clinical neuroscience and biotechnology. Sakas DE; Panourias IG; Simpson BA; Krames ES Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2007; 97(Pt 1):3-10. PubMed ID: 17691351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Intravesical electrical stimulation of the bladder: pro. Kaplan WE Urology; 2000 Jul; 56(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 10869607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The future of implantable neuroprosthetic devices: ethical considerations. Saha S; Chhatbar P J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2009; 19(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 20666712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]