214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14658171)
21. Factors determining a low dose of haemodialysis as measured by ionic dialysance in critical patients with acute kidney injury.
Rosa-Diez G; Greloni G; Crucelegui M; Bedini-Roca M; Heredia-Martínez A; Coli ML; Giannasi S; San-Román E; Pizarro R; Belzitti C; Algranati S; Heguilen R
Nefrologia; 2012 May; 32(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 22535160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Ionic dialysance: which relationship with effective urea clearance?].
Pozzoni P; Pozzi M; Di Filippo S
G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S231-5. PubMed ID: 15750994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Ionic dialysance and quality control in hemodialysis].
Petitclerc T; Coevoet B
Nephrologie; 2001; 22(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 11572165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy.
Lindley EJ; Chamney PW; Wuepper A; Ingles H; Tattersall JE; Will EJ
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Jan; 24(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 18697799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Relationship between the 1993 Daugirdas Kt/V method and other methods to calculate the dialysis dose].
Teruel JL; Fernández Lucas M; López Sánchez J; Rodríguez JR; Rivera M; Marcén R; Ortuño J
Nefrologia; 2000; 20(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 10822726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Disease severity adversely affects delivery of dialysis in acute renal failure.
Schiffl H
Nephron Clin Pract; 2007; 107(4):c163-9. PubMed ID: 17975323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?
Locatelli F; Buoncristiani U; Canaud B; Köhler H; Petitclerc T; Zucchelli P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 Jan; 20(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 15632348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving the efficiency of short-term single-needle hemodialysis.
Rostoker G; Griuncelli M; Loridon C; Bourlet T; Welsch K; Benmaadi A
Ren Fail; 2009; 31(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 19462273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparisons of Kt/V evaluated using an online method and calculated from urea measurements in patients on intermittent hemodialysis.
Grzegorzewska AE; Banachowicz W
Hemodial Int; 2006 Oct; 10 Suppl 2():S5-9. PubMed ID: 17022752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Non-invasive monitoring of effective dialysis dose delivered to the haemodialysis patient.
Petitclerc T; Béné B; Jacobs C; Jaudon MC; Goux N
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1995; 10(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 7753455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimating dialysis adequacy using ionic dialysance.
Carl DE; Feldman G
Ren Fail; 2008; 30(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 18569928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [How much body water volume affects evaluation of urea clearance in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis?].
Jakić M; Mihaljević D; Zibar L
Acta Med Croatica; 2004; 58(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15125390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Simple Kt/V formulas based on urea mass balance theory.
Garred LJ; Barichello DL; DiGiuseppe B; McCready WG; Canaud BC
ASAIO J; 1994; 40(4):997-1004. PubMed ID: 7858339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy and clinical utility of dialysis dose measurement using online ionic dialysance.
Katopodis KP; Hoenich NA
Clin Nephrol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 11924753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of the different methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in pediatric hemodialysis.
Kietkajornkul C; Thirakhupt P; Chulamokha Y; Jaiprong S; Kitpanich S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():S180-7. PubMed ID: 16858957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is Kt/V urea a satisfactory measure for dosing the newer dialysis regimens?
Depner TA; Vanholder R; Dhondt AM; Van Biesen W; Gotch FA; Casino FG
Semin Dial; 2001; 14(1):8-21. PubMed ID: 11208029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ionic dialysance: a new valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency in acute renal failure?
Ridel C; Osman D; Mercadal L; Anguel N; Petitclerc T; Richard C; Vinsonneau C
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 17235509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is ionic dialysance a valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency?
Mercadal L; Petitclerc T; Jaudon MC; Béné B; Goux N; Jacobs C
Artif Organs; 1998 Dec; 22(12):1005-9. PubMed ID: 9876090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of the length of each hemodialysis session by on-line dialysate urea monitoring.
Hernandez-Herrera G; Martin-Malo A; Rodriguez M; Aljama P
Nephron; 2001 Sep; 89(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11528230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: comparison to standard method of urea removal.
Racki S; Zaputović L; Maleta I; Grzetić M; Mavrić Z; Devcić B; Vujicić B
Ren Fail; 2005; 27(5):601-4. PubMed ID: 16153000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
