These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14660076)

  • 1. Auditory information processing is altered in novelty stress conditions: first session effects in auditory-evoked potentials.
    Dietl T; Vogl L; Dirlich G
    Int J Neurosci; 2004 Jan; 114(1):131-42. PubMed ID: 14660076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 18287956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender-specific development of auditory information processing in children: an ERP study.
    Nanova P; Lyamova L; Hadjigeorgieva M; Kolev V; Yordanova J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):1992-2003. PubMed ID: 18579438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct evidence for differential roles of temporal and frontal components of auditory change detection.
    Shalgi S; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1878-88. PubMed ID: 17239410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of aging on habituation to novelty: an ERP study.
    Richardson C; Bucks RS; Hogan AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 20869996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related differences in auditory evoked responses during rapid perceptual learning.
    Alain C; Snyder JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):356-66. PubMed ID: 18083619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
    Wise V; McFarlane AC; Clark CR; Battersby M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study.
    van Zuijen TL; Simoens VL; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1292-303. PubMed ID: 16859415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials.
    Damaschke J; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 15953525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frontal lobe involvement in the processing of meaningful auditory stimuli develops during childhood and adolescence.
    Bender S; Oelkers-Ax R; Resch F; Weisbrod M
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):759-73. PubMed ID: 16934494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
    König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduced suppression or labile memory? Mechanisms of inefficient filtering of irrelevant information in older adults.
    Fabiani M; Low KA; Wee E; Sable JJ; Gratton G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 16768366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tracking the voluntary control of auditory spatial attention with event-related brain potentials.
    Störmer VS; Green JJ; McDonald JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 19170950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Winkler I; Horváth J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.