These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14660324)
1. 2003 Schwartz Award. Pitfalls of peer review. The limited protections of state and federal peer review law for physicians. Nijm LM J Leg Med; 2003 Dec; 24(4):541-56. PubMed ID: 14660324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 10126149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review: federal and state protection. Kennedy KE Minn Med; 1996 Mar; 79(3):52-4. PubMed ID: 8839070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal access to patient health records/protection of quality assurance activities. Feehan KP Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):3-10, 31. PubMed ID: 10114435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Professional Standards Review Organization: some problems of confidentiality. Springer EW Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):361-80. PubMed ID: 11658319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners: reporting on adverse and negative actions. Final rule. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS Fed Regist; 2010 Jan; 75(18):4655-82. PubMed ID: 20352662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims? Cross LL Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protection for reporting. Law creating database snuffs fear of litigation. Fong T Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(31):12. PubMed ID: 16114831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A tough act to follow: Wisconsin's Quality Improvement Act great for health care providers. Coyne SE WMJ; 2011 Apr; 110(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 21560564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical malpractice: an overview of federal and state policy options. Williams J Issue Brief (Public Policy Inst (Am Assoc Retired Pers)); 2005 Jul; (IB75):1-14. PubMed ID: 16114135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HCQIA's grant of immunity: panacea or Pandora's box. Scott C Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Jan; 9(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10116004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course? Brown LC; Stanton WC; Paye W Whittier Law Rev; 1997; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: law commentary. Peart N N Z Bioeth J; 2002 Feb; 3(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 15770771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches? Donovan RE J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lessons learned from the "laboratories of democracy": a critique of federal medical liability reform. Conroy AD Cornell Law Rev; 2006 Jul; 91(5):1159-202. PubMed ID: 16827219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protecting hospitals from judicial narrowing of state peer review statutes. Lending RM Healthspan; 1990 Oct; 7(9):8-11. PubMed ID: 10107402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. George JE; Rouse AR N J Med; 1987 Jun; 84(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 3475597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New Pennsylvania law requires error reporting for learning purposes. Levenson D Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2004 Jul; 15(14):1-2, 5-6. PubMed ID: 15285061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]