These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14660324)

  • 21. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach.
    Mills DH
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records.
    Peterson RN
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review.
    Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medical Errors and Patient Safety: Reducing Medical Errors and Improving Patient Safety.
    Karberg J;
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2015 Dec; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 27116771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The fox guarding the henhouse: how the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and State peer review protection statutes have helped protect bad faith peer review in the medical community.
    van Geertruyden YH
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):239-71. PubMed ID: 15255061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PL 99-660: improved protections or expensive requirements?
    Simonds G
    Health Prog; 1988 May; 69(4):59-62. PubMed ID: 10287183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Antitrust law and peer review remain at odds.
    Riffer J
    Hospitals; 1986 Feb; 60(3):58. PubMed ID: 3753695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Groups seek protection for peer review.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Jan; 18(4):4. PubMed ID: 10285506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Snelson E
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1603858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases.
    Leiker M
    WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Professional peer review. Precautions for physicians.
    Struthers MS; Snelson EA
    Minn Med; 1991 Aug; 74(8):27-30. PubMed ID: 1921931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethical problems for physicians raised by AIDS and HIV infection: conflicting legal obligations of confidentiality and disclosure.
    McDonald BA
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1989; 22(2):557-92. PubMed ID: 16998984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer review: a secret affair?
    Dunn LJ
    Trustee; 1978 Apr; 31(4):9-11, 13. PubMed ID: 10307158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recent decision leaves gap in peer review discovery protections. Pagano v. Oroville Hospital.
    Wisch CJ; Penner IE
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Jul; 8(7):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. State access to peer review records: a clash of public policy.
    Singer AR; Willett DE
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):11-6. PubMed ID: 10294742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medical errors and patient safety.
    Berger JL; Whitehead A
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2008 Jan; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 18345569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. HCQII (Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative): local cooperative projects.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1994 Mar; 97(3):50. PubMed ID: 8065769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physician peer review. Serving the patient or the physician?
    Cate MJ
    J Leg Med; 1999 Dec; 20(4):479-506. PubMed ID: 10641461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The two faces of gag provisions: patients and physicians in a bind.
    Brand GS; Munoz GM; Nichols MG; Okata MU; Pitt JB; Seager S
    Yale Law Policy Rev; 1998; 17():249-80. PubMed ID: 16437824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.