These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14661511)

  • 21. Esthetic preferences for facial soft tissue profiles.
    Sukhia RH; Khan M; Fida M; Shaikh A; Azam SI
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 22031990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facial profile-esthetics and acceptance.
    Bhatia AF
    Indian J Dent Res; 1989; 1(2-3):45-53. PubMed ID: 2490120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Self-perception of the facial profile: an aid in treatment planning for orthognathic surgery.
    Bullen RN; Kook YA; Kim K; Park JH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 24342575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Harmonic analysis and clustering of facial profiles.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Mianí A; Poggio CE; Schmitz J
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 1291611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computer-animated comparison of self-perception with actual profiles of orthodontic and nonorthodontic subjects.
    Kitay D; BeGole EA; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 10686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Holdaway measurement norms in Turkish adults.
    Sahin Sağlam AM
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 12553619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in esthetic standards since 1940.
    Berneburg M; Dietz K; Niederle C; Göz G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):450.e1-9; discussion 450-1. PubMed ID: 20362894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients.
    Shimomura T; Ioi H; Nakata S; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):e291-7. PubMed ID: 21457834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.
    Tatarunaite E; Playle R; Hood K; Shaw W; Richmond S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):676-82; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 15953892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The perception of children's computer-imaged facial profiles by patients, mothers and clinicians.
    Miner RM; Anderson NK; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1034-9. PubMed ID: 18004912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lip posture following debonding of labial appliances based on conventional profile photographs.
    Abed Y; Har-Zion G; Redlich M
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 19216600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.