These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14661511)

  • 41. The relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: an epidemiological survey on young Italian adults.
    Senna A; Abbenante D; Tremolizzo L; Campus G; Strohmenger L
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17032444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile.
    Khosravanifard B; Rakhshan V; Raeesi E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22858016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Chin, nose, and lips. Normal ratios in young men and women.
    Skinazi GL; Lindauer SJ; Isaacson RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 7977193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Facial aesthetic preferences among Asian women: are all oriental Asians the same?
    Dobke M; Chung C; Takabe K
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 16547625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Additive mentoplasty as a corrective operation for profile and labial posture].
    Volpato B; Dal Soglio AP
    Mondo Ortod; 1989; 14(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 2639240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment.
    Nanda RS; Ghosh J
    Semin Orthod; 1995 Jun; 1(2):67-81. PubMed ID: 8935046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. "Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder"? Aspects of beauty and attractiveness.
    Borelli C; Berneburg M
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2010 May; 8(5):326-30. PubMed ID: 20537001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Facial profile preferences: differences in the perception of children with and without orthodontic history.
    Cala L; Spalj S; Slaj M; Lapter MV; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):442-450. PubMed ID: 20889049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15898368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of facial convexity on facial attractiveness in Japanese.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 17973684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation.
    Chew MT; Sandham A; Soh J; Wong HB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17685780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18263888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Facial proportions of the young with the beautiful faces of Sichuan descent].
    Zhao B; Li L; Bai Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 May; 15(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 11480031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population.
    Mantzikos T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jul; 114(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9674673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.