119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1466182)
1. Scaling, dry skin and gender. A bioengineering study of dry skin.
Jemec GB; Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 177():26-8. PubMed ID: 1466182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A double-blind comparison of two creams containing urea as the active ingredient. Assessment of efficacy and side-effects by non-invasive techniques and a clinical scoring scheme.
Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 177():34-43. PubMed ID: 1466184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A three-hour test for rapid comparison of effects of moisturizers and active constituents (urea). Measurement of hydration, scaling and skin surface lipidization by noninvasive techniques.
Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 177():29-33. PubMed ID: 1466183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimizing EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) for pharmacies.
Kang BC; Kim YE; Kim YJ; Chang MJ; Choi HD; Li K; Shin WG
Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 23815476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristic differences in barrier and hygroscopic properties between normal and cosmetic dry skin. I. Enhanced barrier analysis with sequential tape-stripping.
Lu N; Chandar P; Tempesta D; Vincent C; Bajor J; McGuiness H
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2014 Apr; 36(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 24397786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of probe application pressure on in vitro and in vivo capacitance (Corneometer CM 825(®)) and conductance (Skicon 200 EX(®)) measurements.
Clarys P; Clijsen R; Barel AO
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Nov; 17(4):445-50. PubMed ID: 21338409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of hydration in the stratum corneum with the MoistureMeter and comparison with the Corneometer.
Alanen E; Nuutinen J; Nicklén K; Lahtinen T; Mönkkönen J
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Feb; 10(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 14731246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A model to assess the efficacy of moisturizers--the quantification of soap-induced xerosis by image analysis of adhesive-coated discs (D-Squames).
El Gammal C; Pagnoni A; Kligman AM; el Gammal S
Clin Exp Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 21(5):338-43. PubMed ID: 9136151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical measurement of the water content of the stratum corneum in vivo and in vitro under various conditions: comparison between skin surface hygrometer and corneometer in evaluation of the skin surface hydration state.
Hashimoto-Kumasaka K; Takahashi K; Tagami H
Acta Derm Venereol; 1993 Oct; 73(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 7904396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring the effects of topical moisturizers on changes in stratum corneum thickness, water gradients and hydration in vivo.
Crowther JM; Sieg A; Blenkiron P; Marcott C; Matts PJ; Kaczvinsky JR; Rawlings AV
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(3):567-77. PubMed ID: 18616783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of age, anatomic site and race on skin roughness and scaliness.
Manuskiatti W; Schwindt DA; Maibach HI
Dermatology; 1998; 196(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 9669115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of self-reported skin complaints with objective skin signs among adolescents.
Halvorsen JA; Braae Olesen A; Thoresen M; Holm JØ; Bjertness E; Dalgard F
Acta Derm Venereol; 2008; 88(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 19002341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biophysical properties of dry atopic and normal skin with special reference to effects of skin care products.
Lodén M
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1995; 192():1-48. PubMed ID: 7653198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioengineering and subjective approaches to the clinical evaluation of dry skin.
Byrne AJ
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2010 Dec; 32(6):410-21. PubMed ID: 20572886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional assessment of a washing emulsion for sensitive skin: mild impairment of stratum corneum hydration, pH, barrier function, lipid content, integrity and cohesion in a controlled washing test.
Bornkessel A; Flach M; Arens-Corell M; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 15691260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biophysical methods of providing objective documentation of the effects of moisturizing creams.
Lodén M
Skin Res Technol; 1995 Aug; 1(3):101-8. PubMed ID: 27328436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in skin barrier function following long-term treatment with moisturizers, a randomized controlled trial.
Buraczewska I; Berne B; Lindberg M; Törmä H; Lodén M
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 156(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 17300239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple method for the study of scale pattern and effects of a moisturizer--qualitative and quantitative evaluation by D-Squame tape compared with parameters of epidermal hydration.
Serup J; Winther A; Blichmann C
Clin Exp Dermatol; 1989 Jul; 14(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 2591089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image analysis of skin scaling using D-Squame samplers: comparison with clinical scoring and use for assessing moisturizer efficacy.
Black D; Boyer J; Lagarde JM
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2006 Feb; 28(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 18492199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of xerosis and ageing on epidermal proliferation and differentiation.
Engelke M; Jensen JM; Ekanayake-Mudiyanselage S; Proksch E
Br J Dermatol; 1997 Aug; 137(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 9292070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
