These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14661908)

  • 1. Safety and efficacy evaluation of a new ERG electrode (the LVP electrode) part II. Flash ERG pilot study.
    Mohan Ram LS; Jalali S; Faheemuddin S; Das T; Nutheti R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 107(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 14661908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and efficacy evaluation of a new electrode (the LVP electrode) part I. Pattern ERG pilot study.
    Mohan Ram LS; Jalali S; Roopa Reddy PS; Rao VS; Das T; Nutheti R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 107(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 14661907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design of a new disposable ERG electrode.
    Hiroi K; Miyake M; Hashimoto T; Honda Y
    Ophthalmologica; 1995; 209(6):299-301. PubMed ID: 8751335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between Dawson, Trick, and Litzkow electrode and contact lens electrodes used in clinical electroretinography.
    Kuze M; Uji Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2000; 44(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 10974293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing DTL microfiber and Neuroline skin electrode in the Mini Ganzfeld ERG.
    Lapkovska A; Palmowski-Wolfe AM; Todorova MG
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():137. PubMed ID: 27491453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a new fiber electrode prototype for clinical electroretinography.
    Berezovsky A; Pereira JM; Salomão SR; Santos VR; Schor P
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18641814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.
    Yin H; Pardue MT
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 108(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15104170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents.
    Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electroretinography in dogs using a fiber electrode prototype.
    Pereira AL; Montiani-Ferreira F; Santos VR; Salomão SR; Souza C; Berezovsky A
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23558860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good?
    Woo J; Jung S; Gauvin M; Lachapelle P
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 28741115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes.
    Beeler P; Barthelmes D; Sutter FK; Helbig H; Fleischhauer JC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 17458789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison between subtraction skin electrodes and corneal-contact electrodes in flash electroretinograms].
    Kaid T; Matsunag M; Hanaya J; Nakamura Y; Ohtani S; Miyat K; Kondo M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Jan; 117(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 23424970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained with the DTL electrode.
    Hébert M; Vaegan ; Lachapelle P
    Vision Res; 1999 Mar; 39(6):1069-70. PubMed ID: 10343826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two patient-friendly ERG electrodes.
    Hidajat RR; McLay JL; Elder MJ; Goode DH; Morton JP; Burley CD
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 26(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 12854623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Multifocal ERG using ERG-jet and Gold Foil electrodes in normal subjects: comparison and reproducibility].
    Thimonier C; Daubas P; Bourdon L; Deral-Stephant V; Menu JP; Vignal R; Roux C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Jun; 31(6 Pt 1):585-90. PubMed ID: 18772809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New disposable ERG electrode made of anomalous polyvinyl alcohol gel.
    Honda Y; Naoi N; Kim SY; Sakaue E; Nambu M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1986 Jul; 63(2):205-7. PubMed ID: 3743339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recording the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram with the DTL electrode.
    Lachapelle P; Benoit J; Little JM; Lachapelle B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1993; 83(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 8334927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel method to reduce noise in electroretinography using skin electrodes: a study of noise level, inter-session variability, and reproducibility.
    Yamashita T; Miki A; Tabuchi A; Funada H; Kondo M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 37(2):317-324. PubMed ID: 27278187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of DTL electrode position on the amplitude and implicit time of the electroretinogram.
    Brouwer AH; de Wit GC; de Boer JH; van Genderen MM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 140(3):201-209. PubMed ID: 31686287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified ERG-Jet™ contact lens electrodes for use in infants and toddlers-update.
    Brodie SE
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 137(3):203-205. PubMed ID: 30417311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.