These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14663305)

  • 1. Laser pointer visual field screening.
    Lee MS; Balcer LJ; Volpe NJ; Liu GT; Ying GS; Galetta SL
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 23(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 14663305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confrontation visual field loss as a function of decibel sensitivity loss on automated static perimetry. Implications on the accuracy of confrontation visual field testing.
    Shahinfar S; Johnson LN; Madsen RW
    Ophthalmology; 1995 Jun; 102(6):872-7. PubMed ID: 7777293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
    Bruun-Jensen J
    Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Entoptic perimetry screening for central diabetic scotomas and macular edema.
    Brown JC; Kylstra JA; Mah ML
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Apr; 107(4):755-9. PubMed ID: 10768339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency doubling perimetry in patients with mild and moderate pituitary tumor-associated visual field defects detected by conventional perimetry.
    Monteiro ML; Moura FC; Cunha LP
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 17589707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.
    Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
    Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
    Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
    Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid confrontation screening for peripheral visual field defects and extinction.
    Anderson AJ; Shuey NH; Wall M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 19125747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating a visual field screening test for glaucoma: how the choice of the gold standard affects the validity of the test.
    Ellish NJ; Higginbotham EJ
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 8(5):297-307. PubMed ID: 11922383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between static automated and scanning laser entoptic perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Plummer DJ; Lopez A; Azen SP; LaBree L; Bartsch DU; Sadun AA; Freeman WR
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1693-701. PubMed ID: 10964832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry screening for detecting neuro-ophthalmologic disease.
    Siatkowski RM; Lam BL; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Halikman AM
    Ophthalmology; 1996 Jun; 103(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 8643246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using motion perimetry to detect visual field defects in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Montgomery EB
    Neurology; 1995 Jun; 45(6):1169-75. PubMed ID: 7783884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Alward WL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 10755955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology.
    Quigley HA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):819-29. PubMed ID: 9645719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.
    Yamada N; Chen PP; Mills RP; Leen MM; Lieberman MF; Stamper RL; Stanford DC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Nov; 117(11):1479-84. PubMed ID: 10565516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical testing of visual fields using a laser pointer and a wall.
    Stark R
    Pract Neurol; 2013 Aug; 13(4):258-9. PubMed ID: 23625143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scanning laser entoptic perimetry for the detection of age-related macular degeneration.
    Freeman WR; El-Bradey M; Plummer DJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 122(11):1647-51. PubMed ID: 15534125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.