518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14663347)
1. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
Ricketts TA; Picou EM
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 2: verification of different approaches to estimating directional benefit.
Dittberner AB; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17204898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
Ricketts T
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an adaptive directional system in a DSP hearing aid.
Bentler RA; Tubbs JL; Egge JL; Flamme GA; Dittberner AB
Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 15248806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Directional hearing aid based on array technology.
Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ; Verschuure J
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
