These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14663534)

  • 21. No. 396-Fetal Health Surveillance: Intrapartum Consensus Guideline.
    Dore S; Ehman W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Mar; 42(3):316-348.e9. PubMed ID: 32178781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consumer information on fetal heart rate monitoring during labor: a content analysis: a content analysis.
    Torres J; De Vries R; Low LK
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2014; 28(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 24781772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimizing perinatal neurologic injury at term: is cesarean section the answer?
    Miller R; Depp R
    Clin Perinatol; 2008 Sep; 35(3):549-59, xi. PubMed ID: 18952021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Boylan P
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Mar; 1(1):73-95. PubMed ID: 3311514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tucker JM; Hauth JC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 33(3):515-25. PubMed ID: 2225584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 3rd edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    Nurs Womens Health; 2018 Dec; 22(6):e1-e32. PubMed ID: 30501909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Follow-up national survey (Sweden) of routines for intrapartum fetal surveillance.
    Holzmann M; Nordström L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):712-4. PubMed ID: 20102293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Practice variation in the management of intrapartum fetal distress in The Netherlands and the Western world.
    Bullens LM; Moors S; van Runnard Heimel PJ; van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():48-53. PubMed ID: 27566222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electronic fetal monitoring: a bridge too far.
    Sartwelle TP
    J Leg Med; 2012 Jul; 33(3):313-79. PubMed ID: 22991955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intrapartum fetal assessment. A review.
    Huddleston JF
    Clin Perinatol; 1999 Sep; 26(3):549-68, v. PubMed ID: 10494464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Abnormal fetal heart rate patterns associated with different labour managements and intrauterine resuscitation techniques].
    Verspyck E; Sentilhes L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S56-64. PubMed ID: 18187267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fetal heart rate monitoring practices at a public hospital in Northern Uganda - what health workers document, do and say.
    Ayebare E; Jonas W; Ndeezi G; Nankunda J; Hanson C; Tumwine JK; Hjelmstedt A
    Glob Health Action; 2020; 13(1):1711618. PubMed ID: 31955672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A randomised controlled trial of admission electronic fetal monitoring in normal labour.
    Cheyne H; Dunlop A; Shields N; Mathers AM
    Midwifery; 2003 Sep; 19(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 12946338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Continuous electronic fetal heart monitoring versus intermittent auscultation during labor: Would the literature outcomes have the same results if they were interpreted following the NICHHD guidelines?
    Tommaso MD; Pinzauti S; Bandinelli S; Poli C; Ragusa A
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Sep; 28(9):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 31464110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal.
    Kc A; Wrammert J; Clark RB; Ewald U; Målqvist M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():233. PubMed ID: 27542350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure to rescue as a process measure to evaluate fetal safety during labor.
    Beaulieu MJ
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2009; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19104315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate during labor: an opportunity for shared decision making.
    Hersh S; Megregian M; Emeis C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 24758413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices.
    Mueller-Heubach E; MacDonald HM; Joret D; Portman MA; Edelstone DI; Caritis SN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 7405966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.
    Alfirevic Z; Devane D; Gyte GM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD006066. PubMed ID: 16856111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.