BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14664055)

  • 1. A framework for evaluation of medical information systems.
    Turunen P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():611-6. PubMed ID: 14664055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Which health information systems for the evaluation of health actions?].
    Migeot V; Ingrand P; Salmi LR
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Dec; 48(6):551-60. PubMed ID: 11148427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A proposed benefits evaluation framework for health information systems in Canada.
    Lau F; Hagens S; Muttitt S
    Healthc Q; 2007; 10(1):112-6, 118. PubMed ID: 17326376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome measures in clinical information systems evaluation.
    Roderer NK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1096-100. PubMed ID: 15360982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards an evaluation framework for information quality management (IQM) practices for health information systems--evaluation criteria for effective IQM practices.
    Mohammed SA; Yusof MM
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Apr; 19(2):379-87. PubMed ID: 22502634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Feb; 37(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 15016386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical informatics standards applicable to emergency department information systems: making sense of the jumble.
    Coonan KM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 11(11):1198-205. PubMed ID: 15528585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of evidence in health informatics: how did the quality of healthcare IT evaluation publications develop from 1982 to 2005?
    de Keizer NF; Ammenwerth E
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jan; 77(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17208040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategic constraints in health informatics: are expectations realistic?
    Southon FC; Braithwaite J; Lorenzi NM
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 1997; 12(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 10167613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Destination data. Data quality management key to organizing information.
    Fletcher DM
    Healthc Inform; 1998 Feb; 15(2):155-6, 158. PubMed ID: 10177674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health informatics and the delivery of care to older people.
    Koch S; Hägglund M
    Maturitas; 2009 Jul; 63(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 19487092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Virtual slides for routine diagnosis. The importance of using the HL7 (Health Level 7) and DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine) informatics standards].
    Lebozec CD; Bourquard K; Fabiani B; Capron F; Klossa J; Cauvin JC; Cordonnier E; Henin D
    Ann Pathol; 2008 Nov; 28 Spec No 1(1):S109-12. PubMed ID: 18984283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation during design of a regional seamless network of social and health care services--information technology perspective.
    Nykänen P; Karimaa E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 90():539-42. PubMed ID: 15460751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.
    Ammenwerth E; de Keizer N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1289-94. PubMed ID: 15361022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defining a framework for health information technology evaluation.
    Eisenstein EL; Juzwishin D; Kushniruk AW; Nahm M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 164():94-9. PubMed ID: 21335694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The strategic management of data quality in healthcare.
    Kerr KA; Norris T; Stockdale R
    Health Informatics J; 2008 Dec; 14(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 19008276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Setting the standards stage. If health information exchange is to get to the next level, formulating standards will be an absolute key.
    Raths D
    Healthc Inform; 2008 Mar; 25(3):34-5. PubMed ID: 18416234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal.
    Haynes RB; Walker CJ
    Arch Intern Med; 1987 Jul; 147(7):1297-301. PubMed ID: 3606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the ISO/IEC 17799 framework in healthcare information security management.
    Posthumus L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 103():447-52. PubMed ID: 15747954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metadata - an international standard for clinical knowledge resources.
    Klein GO
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():839-43. PubMed ID: 21893865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.