323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14664682)
1. Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis.
Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Chacón-Moscoso S
Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):448-67. PubMed ID: 14664682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
Chan W; Chan DW
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary?
Field AP
Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):444-67. PubMed ID: 16392999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The metric comparability of meta-analytic effect-size estimators from factorial designs.
Gillett R
Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 14664680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing N = 1 effect size indices in presence of autocorrelation.
Manolov R; Solanas A
Behav Modif; 2008 Nov; 32(6):860-75. PubMed ID: 18497425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
Enders CK
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Viechtbauer W
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs.
Olejnik S; Algina J
Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):434-47. PubMed ID: 14664681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some properties of r equivalent: a simple effect size indicator.
Hsu LM
Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 16392997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
Formann AK
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data.
Olkin I; Sampson A
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):317-22. PubMed ID: 9544524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.
Seol H
J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 10431491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Basic meta-analysis: conceptualization and computation.
Verhulst SJ; Colliver JA
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 19218849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
