These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14664685)

  • 21. How many repeated measurements are useful?
    Overall JE
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 May; 52(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8835686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.
    Guimaraes P; Palesch Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 17321219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MCMC estimation for the p(2) network regression model with crossed random effects.
    Zijlstra BJ; van Duijn MA; Snijders TA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):143-66. PubMed ID: 19208289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations.
    Heo M; Leon AC
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 15558576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multi-center randomized clinical trials in oral and maxillofacial surgery: modeling of fixed and random effects.
    Chuang SK; Hatch JP; Rugh J; Dodson TB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 34(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 16053839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adjustment for baseline measurement error in randomized controlled trials induces bias.
    Chan SF; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Walter SD
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Aug; 25(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 15296815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
    Owens CM; Ferron JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Individual allocation had an advantage over cluster randomization in statistical efficiency in some circumstances.
    Hewitt CE; Torgerson DJ; Miles JN
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1004-8. PubMed ID: 18411038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36.
    Walters SJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 May; 2():26. PubMed ID: 15161494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Power analyses for correlations from clustered study designs.
    Tu XM; Kowalski J; Crits-Christoph P; Gallop R
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2587-606. PubMed ID: 16025545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example.
    Schafer JL; Kang J
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):279-313. PubMed ID: 19071996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis of raw mean differences.
    Bond CF; Wiitala WL; Richard FD
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 14664679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing N = 1 effect size indices in presence of autocorrelation.
    Manolov R; Solanas A
    Behav Modif; 2008 Nov; 32(6):860-75. PubMed ID: 18497425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Varying cluster sizes in trials with clusters in one treatment arm: sample size adjustments when testing treatment effects with linear mixed models.
    Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2307-24. PubMed ID: 19472169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating clinical significance: incorporating robust statistics with normative comparison tests.
    van Wieringen K; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 23751017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A discrete random effects probit model with application to the demand for preventive care.
    Deb P
    Health Econ; 2001 Jul; 10(5):371-83. PubMed ID: 11466800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of fixed- and random-effects models for classifying hospitals as mortality outliers: a Monte Carlo assessment.
    Austin PC; Alter DA; Tu JV
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(6):526-39. PubMed ID: 14672113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.