These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1466546)

  • 1. Characteristics of prosthetic mesh and autogenous fascia in abdominal wall reconstruction after prolonged implantation.
    Matloub HS; Jensen P; Grunert BK; Sanger JR; Yousif NJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 1992 Dec; 29(6):508-11. PubMed ID: 1466546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects.
    Jenkins SD; Klamer TW; Parteka JJ; Condon RE
    Surgery; 1983 Aug; 94(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 6224307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduction of postoperative adhesions to Marlex mesh using experimental adhesion barriers in rats.
    Naim JO; Pulley D; Scanlan K; Hinshaw JR; Lanzafame RJ
    J Laparoendosc Surg; 1993 Apr; 3(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 8518475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Marlex and Gore-tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat.
    Murphy JL; Freeman JB; Dionne PG
    Can J Surg; 1989 Jul; 32(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 2736451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use and evaluation of the usefulness of synthetic materials-- Dallop, Marlex and Gore-tex in alloplasty of ventral hernia].
    Otto S; Przetakiewicz Z
    Wiad Lek; 1990 Sep 1-15; 43(17-18):858-65. PubMed ID: 2148995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of novel synthetic materials with traditional methods to repair exposed abdominal wall fascial defects.
    Aliabadi-Wahle S; Cnota M; Choe E; Jacob JT; Flint LM; Ferrara JJ
    J Invest Surg; 1998; 11(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 9700617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of relaparotomy through previously integrated polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene experimental implants in the abdominal wall.
    Bellón JM; Contreras LA; Buján J; Pascual G; Carrera-San Martín A
    J Am Coll Surg; 1999 May; 188(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 10235573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene patch (Mycro Mesh) and polypropylene prosthesis (Marlex) for repair of abdominal wall defects.
    Bellón JM; Buján J; Contreras LA; Carrera-San Martín A; Jurado F
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Jul; 183(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 8673302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations.
    Tyrell J; Silberman H; Chandrasoma P; Niland J; Shull J
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 2537535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repair of abdominal wall defects: Gore-Tex vs. Marlex graft.
    Sher W; Pollack D; Paulides CA; Matsumoto T
    Am Surg; 1980 Nov; 46(11):618-23. PubMed ID: 6449167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
    Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
    J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of adhesion formation and tensile strength after three laparoscopic herniorrhaphy techniques.
    Rasim ZM; Alzahrani MA; Sigman HH; Meakins JL; Fried GM
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1997 Apr; 7(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 9109243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects.
    Law NW
    Acta Chir Scand; 1990; 156(11-12):759-62. PubMed ID: 1963726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model.
    Menon NG; Rodriguez ED; Byrnes CK; Girotto JA; Goldberg NH; Silverman RP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2003 May; 50(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 12792544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of synthetic meshes used for abdominal wall replacement.
    Lamb JP; Vitale T; Kaminski DL
    Surgery; 1983 May; 93(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 6221427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model.
    Harrell AG; Novitsky YW; Peindl RD; Cobb WS; Austin CE; Cristiano JA; Norton JH; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
    Am Surg; 2006 Sep; 72(9):808-13; discussion 813-4. PubMed ID: 16986391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal prosthetic for acute replacement of the abdominal wall.
    Nagy KK; Perez F; Fildes JJ; Barrett J
    J Trauma; 1999 Sep; 47(3):529-32. PubMed ID: 10498309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of polypropylene mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of contaminated abdominal wall defects--an experimental study.
    Law NW; Ellis H
    Surgery; 1991 May; 109(5):652-5. PubMed ID: 1826970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experimental testing of Dexon, Vicryl and Gore-Tex mesh used to complete the abdominal wall].
    Kateusz J; Misterka S; Staniszewska-Kuś J
    Polim Med; 1994; 24(3-4):3-39. PubMed ID: 7899175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improvement of the tissue integration of a new modified polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis: Mycro Mesh.
    Bellón JM; Buján J; Contreras LA; Carreras-San Martín A; Hernando A; Jurado F
    Biomaterials; 1996 Jul; 17(13):1265-71. PubMed ID: 8805973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.