These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14666079)

  • 1. A new index for evaluating horizontal skeletal discrepancies and predicting treatment outcomes.
    Polk CE; Buchanan D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):663-9. PubMed ID: 14666079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
    Chandra PK; Godfrey K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle.
    Rotberg S; Fried N; Kane J; Shapiro E
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Jun; 77(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 6930164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
    Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The AS/BS occlusal angle, a replacement for the ANB angle].
    Demisch A; Hügli R
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1977 Nov; 87(11):1155-69. PubMed ID: 271358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible.
    Nanda RS; Merrill RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Apr; 105(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 8154458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle's Class III patients.
    Iwasaki H; Ishikawa H; Chowdhury L; Nakamura S; Iida J
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 12407943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Nov; 94(5):432-5. PubMed ID: 3189246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship and reproducibility of angle ANB and the Wits appraisal.
    Rushton R; Cohen AM; Linney AD
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 18(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 1931857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.
    Shildkraut M; Wood DP; Hunter WS
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7794320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications.
    Bishara SE; Fahl JA; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Aug; 84(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 6576637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillo- mandibular relationship--a cephalometric study.
    Kapoor DN; Chandana A; Tandon S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Sep; 22(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 15573662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. F-H to AB plane angle (FABA) for assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Yang SD; Suhr CH
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):223-31; discussion 232. PubMed ID: 7639436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.