277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14666564)
1. Going back in time. Citing cost efficiency, plans offer narrow networks.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(47):14-5. PubMed ID: 14666564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The dynamics of power in the marketplace.
Cochrane JD
Integr Healthc Rep; 1998 Jul; ():1-5. PubMed ID: 10182826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Your newest competitors: alternative-medicine networks.
Grandinetti DA
Med Econ; 1999 May; 76(10):44, 46, 51. PubMed ID: 10537717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HMOs dump more Medicare patients.
Bloice C
Revolution (Oakl); 2003; 4(5):9. PubMed ID: 14631718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of Blues' costs offers fascinating insights.
Capitation Rates Data; 2000 May; 5(5):49-51. PubMed ID: 11066969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Blues rise again. Amid industry turmoil, trademark seen as refuge.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2002 Sep; 32(36):14-5. PubMed ID: 12298320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Gatekeeper products losing favor in many markets.
Manag Care Strateg; 1998 Nov; 6(11):126, 131-3. PubMed ID: 10351372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Blues plan more HMO involvement.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1978 Sep; 33(3):34. PubMed ID: 10277895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumer-choice markets: lessons from FEHBP mental health coverage.
Foote SM; Jones SB
Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(5):125-30. PubMed ID: 10495599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxicare fallout: will CA Blue Cross be next?
Larkin H
Hospitals; 1989 May; 63(9):49. PubMed ID: 2707776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulling up stakes. Anthem's Ohio exit may signal Medicare risk HMO trend.
Rauber C
Mod Healthc; 1998 Jun; 28(24):26. PubMed ID: 10181113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of the gatekeeper. Some organizations are finding ways to modify the "gatekeeper" role and meet the public's demand for increased access.
Nilson JT
Healthc Exec; 1998; 13(4):18-22. PubMed ID: 10181096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Avoiding the pitfalls of capitation and other HMO-physician provider agreements.
Finney LD
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 Jan; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 10158208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting patients' self-referral to specialists.
Hsu J; Go AS; Selby J
JAMA; 2001 Aug; 286(6):672-3. PubMed ID: 11495614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health maintenance organizations and the role of antitrust law.
Kissam PC
Duke Law J; 1978 May; (2):487-541. PubMed ID: 10239065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health plan responses to managed care regulation.
Hurley RE; Draper DA
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(4):30-42. PubMed ID: 12561392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergency care under managed care: a fatal distraction?
Henry GL
Health Syst Rev; 1996; 29(2):55-6, 58, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10156521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Not-for-profit HMOs.
Burrell CE
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1987; 63(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3470098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What you can bargain for when HMOs compete.
Azevedo D
Bus Health; 1995 Jun; 13(6):44-5, 48, 50 passim. PubMed ID: 10164757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Blue shield of California's Access+ HMO.
Richard K; Wood K
Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 10388214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
