76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 146669)
1. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
Schneider G; Kindl P; Spreizer H
Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The resulting skin dose in two-view mammography examinations.
Adliene D; Cibulskaite I; Laurikaitiene J; Adlys G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):298-302. PubMed ID: 20200100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Value of different systems of mammography records with regard to their exposure to radiation and their information content (author's transl)].
John V; Ewen K; Kurz E; Teske HJ
Strahlentherapie; 1978 Feb; 154(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 628932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
Klausz R; Shramchenko N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [First results of mammography with a screen film (author's transl)].
Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
Strahlentherapie; 1979 Jan; 155(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 760273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].
Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R
Rofo; 2001 Feb; 173(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11253092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
Friedrich M
Rontgenblatter; 1981 Apr; 34(4):151-60. PubMed ID: 7015468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A comparison of the radiation dose from film and xeroradiography (author's transl)].
Evers R; Römer M
Rofo; 1975 Jul; 123(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 130303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for in vivo measurement of radiation exposure and related dose in mammography.
Omran HA
Radiol Technol; 1982; 53(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 6927768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.
Hammerstein GR; Miller DW; White DR; Masterson ME; Woodard HQ; Laughlin JS
Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 760167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Radiation dose during mammography using various recording systems (author's transl)].
Heep HH; Bülow-Johansen T; Klemencic J; Wegwitz J
Rofo; 1978 Sep; 129(3):364-7. PubMed ID: 151056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absorbed breast dose: dependence on radiographic modality and technique, and breast thickness.
Skubic SE; Fatouros PP
Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):263-70. PubMed ID: 3763877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reduction of radiation dose during film mammography using a new film-screen combination. Inital report (author's transl)].
Buck J; Barth V
Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 149720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
Brnić Z; Hebrang A
Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [New development in mammographic technique: Grid mammography (author's transl)].
Friedrich M
Rofo; 1978 Feb; 128(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 147219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Film quality in film mammography. Article II: Signal/noise ratio of the recording system as a quantitative measure of quality. Final evaluation of recording systems (author's transl)].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1976 Nov; 125(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 137194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
