These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1466701)

  • 1. The effect of inflammatory synovial fluid on the breaking strength of new "long lasting" absorbable sutures.
    Barber FA; Click JN
    Arthroscopy; 1992; 8(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1466701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inflammatory synovial fluid and absorbable suture strength.
    Barber FA; Gurwitz GS
    Arthroscopy; 1988; 4(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 3233117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polylactide (LTS) causes less inflammation response than polydioxanone (PDS): a meniscus repair model in sheep.
    Burger C; Kabir K; Rangger C; Mueller M; Minor T; Tolba RH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Dec; 126(10):695-705. PubMed ID: 16896739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
    Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair.
    Hapa O; Akşahin E; Erduran M; Davul S; Havitçioğlu H; LaPrade RF; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):577-80. PubMed ID: 23340094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength retention properties of self-reinforced poly L-lactide (SR-PLLA) sutures compared with polyglyconate (Maxon) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures. An in vitro study.
    Mäkelä P; Pohjonen T; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
    Biomaterials; 2002 Jun; 23(12):2587-92. PubMed ID: 12033607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
    Wüst DM; Meyer DC; Favre P; Gerber C
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture.
    Ray JA; Doddi N; Regula D; Williams JA; Melveger A
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct; 153(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 6792722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
    Tobias KM; Kidd CE; Mulon PY; Zhu X
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absorbable sutures in tendon repair. A comparison of PDS with prolene in rabbit tendon repair.
    O'Broin ES; Earley MJ; Smyth H; Hooper AC
    J Hand Surg Br; 1995 Aug; 20(4):505-8. PubMed ID: 7594994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of strength properties of poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and polyglyconate (Maxon) sutures: in vitro, in the subcutis, and in the achilles tendon of rabbits.
    Kangas J; Paasimaa S; Mäkelä P; Leppilahti J; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 11153008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical performance of a collagen meniscus implant with regard to suture material and irrigation fluid.
    Gwinner C; von Roth P; Schmidt S; Ode JE; Wulsten D; Hoburg A
    Knee; 2017 Aug; 24(4):726-732. PubMed ID: 28455166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Maxon and PDS--evaluation and physical and biologic properties of monofilament absorbable suture materials].
    Knoop M; Lünstedt B; Thiede A
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 371(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 3114577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the tensile strengths of four monofilament absorbable suture materials after immersion in canine urine with or without bacteria.
    Greenberg CB; Davidson EB; Bellmer DD; Morton RJ; Payton ME
    Am J Vet Res; 2004 Jun; 65(6):847-53. PubMed ID: 15198227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal suture materials for contaminated gastrointestinal surgery: does infection influence the decrease of the tensile strength of sutures?
    Tanaka Y; Sadahiro S; Ishikawa K; Suzuki T; Kamijo A; Tazume S; Yasuda M
    Surg Today; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22218873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.