These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14667830)

  • 1. Inter-ocular and inter-session reliability of the electroretinogram photopic negative response (PhNR) in non-human primates.
    Fortune B; Bui BV; Cull G; Wang L; Cioffi GA
    Exp Eye Res; 2004 Jan; 78(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 14667830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.
    Joshi NR; Ly E; Viswanathan S
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28508299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Spectral Characteristics of Ganzfeld Stimuli on the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) of the ERG.
    Rangaswamy NV; Shirato S; Kaneko M; Digby BI; Robson JG; Frishman LJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4818-28. PubMed ID: 17898309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina.
    Rangaswamy NV; Frishman LJ; Dorotheo EU; Schiffman JS; Bahrani HM; Tang RA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3827-37. PubMed ID: 15452095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.
    Mortlock KE; Binns AM; Aldebasi YH; North RV
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 121(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 20607349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.
    Berezovsky A; Karanjia R; Fernandes AG; Botelho GIS; Bueno TLN; Ferraz NN; Sacai PY; Coupland SG; Sadun AA; Salomão SR
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):153-163. PubMed ID: 32681419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
    Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.
    Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Harwerth RS; Smith EL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1124-36. PubMed ID: 10235545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term blue light rearing does not affect in vivo retinal function in young rhesus monkeys.
    Lou L; Frishman LJ; Beach KM; Rajagopalan L; Hung LF; She Z; Smith EL; Ostrin LA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 147(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 36995437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of photopic negative response (PhNR) between focal macular and full-field electroretinograms in monkeys.
    Kinoshita J; Takada S; Iwata N; Tani Y
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 132(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 27071393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The decline of the photopic negative response (PhNR) in the rat after optic nerve transection.
    Li B; Barnes GE; Holt WF
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 111(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 16502304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents.
    Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full-field electroretinogram in autism spectrum disorder.
    Constable PA; Gaigg SB; Bowler DM; Jägle H; Thompson DA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 132(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 26868825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of photopic negative responses elicited by red and white xenon flashes in monkeys.
    Miyata K; Ueno S; Kondo M; Koyasu T; Terasaki H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2008; 52(4):327-330. PubMed ID: 18773273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.
    Ortiz G; Drucker D; Hyde C; Staffetti J; Kremers J; Tzekov R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 140(2):115-128. PubMed ID: 31571069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.
    Binns AM; Mortlock KE; North RV
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 122(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 21243403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetry of focal macular photopic negative responses (PhNRs) in monkeys.
    Kurimoto Y; Kondo M; Ueno S; Sakai T; Machida S; Terasaki H
    Exp Eye Res; 2009 Jan; 88(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 18996372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of photopic negative response measurements in the time and time-frequency domains.
    Kundra H; Park JC; McAnany JJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 133(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 27562839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response Characteristics and Retinal Origin of the Photopic Negative Response of the Electroretinogram in Dogs.
    Takada S; Kinoshita J; Iwata N; Imaoka M; Tani Y
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Sep; 42(9):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 28557626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with early diabetic retinopathy.
    Kizawa J; Machida S; Kobayashi T; Gotoh Y; Kurosaka D
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2006; 50(4):367-373. PubMed ID: 16897223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.