These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14668110)

  • 1. Assessment methods for concerns about contaminated sites.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2004 Jan; 67(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 14668110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pollution, contamination and future land use at Brookhaven National Laboratory.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Shukla S; Jeitner C; Ramos R; Tsipoura N; Donio M
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 55(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 18446260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consistency among methods of assessing concerns about the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2003 Jan; 66(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 12653023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing environmental attitudes and concerns about a contaminated site in a densely populated suburban environment.
    Burger J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Feb; 101(1-3):147-65. PubMed ID: 15739267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restoration, stewardship, environmental health, and policy: understanding stakeholders' perceptions.
    Burger J
    Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 12375084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk concerns, land use, stewardship, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory: attitudes of the Shoshone-Bannock and other American Indians.
    Burger J; Roush DE; Ramos R; Gochfeld M
    Environ Res; 2000 Jul; 83(3):298-310. PubMed ID: 10944074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recreational rates and future land-use preferences for four Department of Energy sites: consistency despite demographic and geographical differences.
    Burger J
    Environ Res; 2004 Jun; 95(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 15147927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk perception, future land use and stewardship: comparison of attitudes about Hanford Site and Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.
    Burger J; Sanchez J; Roush D; Gochfeld M
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Apr; 61(4):265-80. PubMed ID: 11383101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public concern about chemicals in the environment: regional differences based on threat potential.
    Howe HL
    Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 2108466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public opinion about public health--United States, 1999.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2000 Mar; 49(12):258-60. PubMed ID: 10774547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toxicology in Australia: a key component of environmental health.
    Priestly BG; Di Marco P; Sim M; Moore MR; Langley A
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2007 Oct; 70(19):1578-83. PubMed ID: 17763075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
    Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions.
    Mayer HJ; Greenberg MR; Burger J; Gochfield M; Powers C; Kosson D; Keren R; Danis C; Vyas V
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):429-46. PubMed ID: 15876215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of chemical mixtures in public health practice.
    de Rosa CT; El-Masri HA; Pohl H; Cibulas W; Mumtaz MM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2004; 7(5):339-50. PubMed ID: 15371239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptions of on-site hunters: environmental concerns, future land use, and cleanup options at the Savannah river site.
    Burger J; Sanchez J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 1999 Jun; 57(4):267-81. PubMed ID: 10406350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
    Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applicability of risk-based management and the need for risk-based economic decision analysis at hazardous waste contaminated sites.
    Khadam I; Kaluarachchi JJ
    Environ Int; 2003 Jul; 29(4):503-19. PubMed ID: 12705948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.
    Munns WR; Helm RC; Adams WJ; Clements WH; Cramer MA; Curry M; DiPinto LM; Johns DM; Seiler R; Williams LL; Young D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 19545189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health effects from hazardous waste incineration facilities: five case studies.
    Pleus RC; Kelly KE
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1996; 12(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 8794540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.