201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14668120)
1. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
Bininda-Emonds OR
Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony analysis supertree construction.
Bininda-Emonds OR; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2001 Aug; 50(4):565-79. PubMed ID: 12116654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genus-level supertree of Cyprinidae (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes), partitioned qualitative clade support and test of macro-evolutionary scenarios.
Gaubert P; Denys G; Oberdorff T
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2009 Nov; 84(4):653-89. PubMed ID: 19857213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae).
Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen V
Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 11943096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.
Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V
Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast computation of supertrees for compatible phylogenies with nested taxa.
Berry V; Semple C
Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):270-88. PubMed ID: 16611599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supertree construction in the genomic age.
Bininda-Emonds OR
Methods Enzymol; 2005; 395():745-57. PubMed ID: 15865993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supertree bootstrapping methods for assessing phylogenetic variation among genes in genome-scale data sets.
Burleigh JG; Driskell AC; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2006 Jun; 55(3):426-40. PubMed ID: 16861207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phylogeny of extant and fossil Juglandaceae inferred from the integration of molecular and morphological data sets.
Manos PS; Soltis PS; Soltis DE; Manchester SR; Oh SH; Bell CD; Dilcher DL; Stone DE
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):412-30. PubMed ID: 17558964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximum likelihood supertrees.
Steel M; Rodrigo A
Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 18398769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Majority-rule supertrees.
Cotton JA; Wilkinson M
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 17558966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.
Fleischauer M; Böcker S
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2408-2421. PubMed ID: 28873954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SDM: a fast distance-based approach for (super) tree building in phylogenomics.
Criscuolo A; Berry V; Douzery EJ; Gascuel O
Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):740-55. PubMed ID: 17060196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amalgamating source trees with different taxonomic levels.
Berry V; Bininda-Emonds OR; Semple C
Syst Biol; 2013 Mar; 62(2):231-49. PubMed ID: 23179602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular phylogeny of the carnivora (mammalia): assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships.
Flynn JJ; Finarelli JA; Zehr S; Hsu J; Nedbal MA
Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):317-37. PubMed ID: 16012099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
